← Table of ContentsEighty Years and More; Reminiscences 1815-1897

CHAPTER XXVII.

SIXTIETH ANNIVERSARY OF THE CLASS OF 1832--THE WOMAN'S BIBLE.

I returned from Geneva to New York city in time to celebrate my

seventy-sixth birthday with my children. I had traveled about constantly

for the last twenty years in France, England, and my own country, and

had so many friends and correspondents, and pressing invitations to

speak in clubs and conventions, that now I decided to turn over a new

leaf and rest in an easy-chair. But so complete a change in one's life

could not be easily accomplished. In spite of my resolution to abide in

seclusion, my daughter and I were induced to join the Botta Club, which

was to meet once a month, alternately, at the residences of Mrs. Moncure

D. Conway and Mrs. Abby Sage Richardson. Though composed of ladies and

gentlemen it proved dull and unprofitable. As the subject for discussion

was not announced until each meeting, no one was prepared with any

well-digested train of thought. It was also decided to avoid all

questions about which there might be grave differences of opinion. This

negative position reminded me of a book on etiquette which I read in my

young days, in which gentlemen were warned, "In the presence of ladies

discuss neither politics, religion, nor social duties, but confine

yourself to art, poetry, and abstract questions which women cannot

understand. The less they know of a subject the more respectfully they

will listen." This club was named in honor of Mrs. Botta, formerly Miss

Anne Lynch, whose drawing room for many years was the social center of

the literati of New York.

On January 16, 1892, we held the Annual Suffrage Convention in

Washington, and, as usual, had a hearing before the Congressional

Committee. My speech on the "Solitude of Self" was well received and was

published in the Congressional Record. The _Woman's Tribune_ struck off

many hundreds of copies and it was extensively circulated.

Notwithstanding my determination to rest, I spoke to many clubs, wrote

articles for papers and magazines, and two important leaflets, one on

"Street Cleaning," another on "Opening the Chicago Exposition on

Sunday." As Sunday was the only day the masses could visit that

magnificent scene, with its great lake, extensive park, artificial

canals, and beautiful buildings, I strongly advocated its being open on

that day. One hundred thousand religious bigots petitioned Congress to

make no appropriation for this magnificent Exposition, unless the

managers pledged themselves to close the gates on Sunday, and hide this

vision of beauty from the common people. Fortunately, this time a sense

of justice outweighed religious bigotry. I sent my leaflets to every

member of Congress and of the State legislatures, and to the managers of

the Exposition, and made it a topic of conversation at every

opportunity. The park and parts of the Exposition were kept open on

Sunday, but some of the machinery was stopped as a concession to narrow

Christian sects.

In June, 1892, at the earnest solicitation of Mrs. Russell Sage, I

attended the dedication of the Gurley Memorial Building, presented to

the Emma Willard Seminary, at Troy, New York, and made the following

address:

"MRS. PRESIDENT, MEMBERS OF THE ALUMNAE:

"It is just sixty years since the class of '32, to which I

belonged, celebrated a commencement in this same room. This was the

great event of the season to many families throughout this State.

Parents came from all quarters; the _élite_ of Troy and Albany

assembled here. Principals from other schools, distinguished

legislators, and clergymen all came to hear girls scan Latin verse,

solve problems in Euclid, and read their own compositions in a

promiscuous assemblage. A long line of teachers anxiously waited

the calling of their classes, and over all, our queenly Madame

Willard presided with royal grace and dignity. Two hundred girls in

gala attire, white dresses, bright sashes, and coral ornaments,

with their curly hair, rosy cheeks, and sparkling eyes, flitted to

and fro, some rejoicing that they had passed through their ordeal,

some still on the tiptoe of expectation, some laughing, some in

tears--altogether a most beautiful and interesting picture.

"Conservatives then, as now, thought the result of the higher

education of girls would be to destroy their delicacy and

refinement. But as the graduates of the Troy Seminary were never

distinguished in after life for the lack of these feminine virtues,

the most timid, even, gradually accepted the situation and trusted

their daughters with Mrs. Willard. But that noble woman endured for

a long period the same ridicule and persecution that women now do

who take an onward step in the march of progress.

"I see around me none of the familiar faces that greeted my coming

or said farewell in parting. I do not know that one of my

classmates still lives. Friendship with those I knew and loved best

lasted but a few years, then our ways in life parted. I should not

know where to find one now, and if I did, probably our ideas would

differ on every subject, as I have wandered in latitudes beyond the

prescribed sphere of women. I suppose it is much the same with many

of you--the familiar faces are all gone, gone to the land of

shadows, and I hope of sunshine too, where we in turn will soon

follow. "And yet, though we who are left are strangers to one

another, we have the same memories of the past, of the same type of

mischievous girls and staid teachers, though with different names.

The same long, bare halls and stairs, the recitation rooms with the

same old blackboards and lumps of chalk taken for generation after

generation, I suppose, from the same pit; the dining room, with its

pillars inconveniently near some of the tables, with its thick,

white crockery and black-handled knives, and viands that never

suited us, because, forsooth, we had boxes of delicacies from home,

or we had been out to the baker's or confectioner's and bought pies

and cocoanut cakes, candy and chewing gum, all forbidden, but that

added to the relish. There, too, were the music rooms, with their

old, second-hand pianos, some with rattling keys and tinny sound,

on which we were supposed to play our scales and exercises for an

hour, though we often slyly indulged in the 'Russian March,'

'Napoleon Crossing the Rhine,' or our national airs, when, as

slyly, Mr. Powell, our music teacher, a bumptious Englishman, would

softly open the door and say in a stern voice, 'Please practice the

lesson I just gave you!'

"Our chief delight was to break the rules, but we did not like to

be caught at it. As we were forbidden to talk with our neighbors in

study hours, I frequently climbed on top of my bureau to talk

through a pipe hole with a daughter of Judge Howell of Canandaigua.

We often met afterward, laughed and talked over the old days, and

kept our friendship bright until the day of her death. Once while

rooming with Harriet Hudson, a sister of Mrs. John Willard, I was

moved to a very erratic performance. Miss Theresa Lee had rung the

bell for retiring, and had taken her rounds, as usual, to see that

the lights were out and all was still, when I peeped out of my

door, and seeing the bell at the head of the stairs nearby, I gave

it one kick and away it went rolling and ringing to the bottom. The

halls were instantly filled with teachers and scholars, all in

white robes, asking what was the matter. Harriet and I ran around

questioning the rest, and what a frolic we had, helter-skelter, up

and down stairs, in each other's rooms, pulling the beds to pieces,

changing girls' clothes from one room to another, etc., etc. The

hall lamps, dimly burning, gave us just light enough for all manner

of depredations without our being recognized, hence the unbounded

latitude we all felt for mischief. In our whole seminary

course--and I was there nearly three years--we never had such a

frolic as that night. It took all the teachers to restore order and

quiet us down again for the night. No suspicion of any

irregularities were ever attached to Harriet and myself. Our

standing for scholarship was good, hence we were supposed to

reflect all the moralities.

"Though strangers, we have a bond of union in all these memories,

of our bright companions, our good teachers, who took us through

the pitfalls of logic, rhetoric, philosophy, and the sciences, and

of the noble woman who founded the institution, and whose unselfish

devotion in the cause of education we are here to celebrate. The

name of Emma Willard is dear to all of us; to know her was to love

and venerate her. She was not only good and gifted, but she was a

beautiful woman. She had a finely developed figure, well-shaped

head, classic features, most genial manners, and a profound

self-respect (a rare quality in woman), that gave her a dignity

truly royal in every position. Traveling in the Old World she was

noticed everywhere as a distinguished personage. And all these

gifts she dedicated to the earnest purpose of her life, the higher

education of women.

"In opening this seminary she could not find young women capable of

teaching the higher branches, hence her first necessity was to

train herself. Amos B. Eaton, who was the principal of the

Rensselaer Polytechnic School for boys here in Troy, told me Mrs.

Willard studied with him every branch he was capable of teaching,

and trained a corps of teachers and regular scholars at the same

time. She took lessons of the Professor every evening when he had

leisure, and studied half the night the branches she was to teach

the next day, thus keeping ahead of her classes. Her intense

earnestness and mental grasp, the readiness with which she turned

from one subject to another, and her retentive memory of every rule

and fact he gave her, was a constant surprise to the Professor.

"All her vacation she devoted to training teachers. She was the

first to suggest the normal-school system. Remembering her deep

interest in the education of women, we can honor her in no more

worthy manner than to carry on her special lifework. As we look

around at all the educated women assembled here to-day and try to

estimate what each has done in her own sphere of action, the

schools founded, the teachers sent forth, the inspiration given to

girls in general, through the long chain of influences started by

our alma mater, we can form some light estimate of the momentous

and far-reaching consequences of Emma Willard's life. We have not

her difficulties to overcome, her trials to endure, but the

imperative duty is laid on each of us to finish the work she so

successfully began. Schools and colleges of a high order are now

everywhere open to women, public sentiment welcomes them to

whatever career they may desire, and our work is to help worthy

girls struggling for a higher education, by founding scholarships

in desirable institutions in every State in the Union. The most

fitting tribute we can pay to Emma Willard is to aid in the

production of a generation of thoroughly educated women.

"There are two kinds of scholarships, equally desirable; a

permanent one, where the interest of a fund from year to year will

support a succession of students, and a temporary one, to help some

worthy individual as she may require. Someone has suggested that

this association should help young girls in their primary

education. But as our public schools possess all the advantages for

a thorough education in the rudiments of learning and are free to

all, our scholarships should be bestowed on those whose ability and

earnestness in the primary department have been proved, and whose

capacity for a higher education is fully shown.

"This is the best work women of wealth can do, and I hope in the

future they will endow scholarships for their own sex instead of

giving millions of dollars to institutions for boys, as they have

done in the past. After all the bequests women have made to Harvard

see how niggardly that institution, in its 'annex,' treats their

daughters. I once asked a wealthy lady to give a few thousands of

dollars to start a medical college and hospital for women in New

York. She said before making bequests she always consulted her

minister and her Bible. He told her there was nothing said in the

Bible about colleges for women. I said, 'Tell him he is mistaken.

If he will turn to 2 'Chron. xxxiv. 22, he will find that when

Josiah, the king, sent the wise men to consult Huldah, the

prophetess, about the book of laws discovered in the temple, they

found Huldah in the college in Jerusalem, thoroughly well informed

on questions of state, while Shallum, her husband, was keeper of

the robes. I suppose his business was to sew on the royal buttons.'

But in spite of this Scriptural authority, the rich lady gave

thirty thousand dollars to Princeton and never one cent for the

education of her own sex.

"Of all the voices to which these walls have echoed for over half a

century, how few remain to tell the story of the early days, and

when we part, how few of us will ever meet again; but I know we

shall carry with us some new inspiration for the work that still

remains for us to do. Though many of us are old in years, we may

still be young in heart. Women trained to concentrate all their

thoughts on family life are apt to think--when their children are

grown up, their loved ones gone, their servants trained to keep the

domestic machinery in motion--that their work in life is done, that

no one needs now their thought and care, quite forgetting that the

hey-day of woman's life is on the shady side of fifty, when the

vital forces heretofore expended in other ways are garnered in the

brain, when their thoughts and sentiments flow out in broader

channels, when philanthropy takes the place of family selfishness,

and when from the depths of poverty and suffering the wail of

humanity grows as pathetic to their ears as once was the cry of

their own children.

"Or, perhaps, the pressing cares of family life ended, the woman

may awake to some slumbering genius in herself for art, science, or

literature, with which to gild the sunset of her life. Longfellow's

beautiful poem, 'Morituri Salutamus,' written for a similar

occasion to this, is full of hope and promise for all of us. He

says:

"'Something remains for us to do or dare;

Even the oldest tree some fruit may bear.

Cato learned Greek at eighty; Sophocles

Wrote his grand Oedipus, and Simonides

Bore off the prize of verse from his compeers,

When each had numbered more than four-score years.

And Theophrastus, at three-score and ten,

Had but begun his Characters of Men;

Chaucer, at Woodstock with the nightingales,

At sixty wrote the Canterbury Tales;

Goethe at Weimar, toiling to the last,

Completed Faust when eighty years were past.

These are indeed exceptions; but they show

How far the gulf-stream of our youth may flow

Into the Arctic regions of our lives,

Where little else than life itself survives.

For age is opportunity no less

Than youth itself, though in another dress,

And as the evening twilight fades away

The sky is filled with stars, invisible by day.'"

On December 21, 1892, we celebrated, for the first time, "Foremothers'

Day." Men had celebrated "Forefathers' Day" for many years, but as women

were never invited to join in their festivities, Mrs. Devereux Blake

introduced the custom of women having a dinner in celebration of that

day. Mrs. Isabella Beecher Hooker spent two days with me, and together

we attended the feast and made speeches. This custom is now annually

observed, and gentlemen sit in the gallery just as ladies had done on

similar occasions.

My son Theodore arrived from France in April, 1893, to attend the

Chicago Exposition, and spent most of the summer with me at Glen Cove,

Long Island, where my son Gerrit and his wife were domiciled. Here we

read Captain Charles King's stories of life at military posts, Sanborn's

"Biography of Bronson Alcott," and Lecky's "History of Rationalism."

Here I visited Charles A. Dana, the Nestor of journalism, and his

charming family. He lived on a beautiful island near Glen Cove. His

refined, artistic taste, shown in his city residence in paintings,

statuary, and rare bric-a-brac, collected in his frequent travels in the

Old World, displayed itself in his island home in the arrangement of an

endless variety of trees, shrubs, and flowers, through which you caught

glimpses of the Sound and distant shores. One seldom meets so gifted a

man as the late editor of the _Sun_. He was a scholar, speaking several

languages; an able writer and orator, and a most genial companion in the

social circle. His wife and daughter are cultivated women. The name of

this daughter, Zoe Dana Underhill, often appears in our popular

magazines as the author of short stories, remarkable for their vivid

descriptions.

I met Mr. Dana for the first time at the Brook Farm Community in 1843,

in that brilliant circle of Boston transcendentalists, who hoped in a

few years to transform our selfish, competitive civilization into a

Paradise where all the altruistic virtues might make co-operation

possible. But alas! the material at hand was not sufficiently plastic

for that higher ideal. In due time the community dissolved and the

members returned to their ancestral spheres. Margaret Fuller, who was a

frequent visitor there, betook herself to matrimony in sunny Italy,

William Henry Channing to the Church, Bronson Alcott to the education of

the young, Frank Cabot to the world of work, Mr. and Mrs. Ripley to

literature, and Charles A. Dana to the press. Mr. Dana was very

fortunate in his family relations. His wife, Miss Eunice MacDaniel, and

her relatives sympathized with him in all his most liberal opinions.

During the summer at Glen Cove I had the pleasure of several long

conversations with Miss Frances L. MacDaniel and her brother Osborne,

whose wife is the sister of Mr. Dana, and who is now assisting Miss

Prestona Mann in trying an experiment, similar to the one at Brook Farm,

in the Adirondacks.

Miss Anthony spent a week with us in Glen Cove. She came to stir me up

to write papers for every Congress at the Exposition, which I did, and

she read them in the different Congresses, adding her own strong words

at the close. Mrs. Russell Sage also came and spent a day with us to

urge me to write a paper to be read at Chicago at the Emma Willard

Reunion, which I did. A few days afterward Theodore and I returned her

visit. We enjoyed a few hours' conversation with Mr Sage, who had made

a very generous gift of a building to the Emma Willard Seminary at

Troy. This school was one of the first established (1820) for girls in

our State, and received an appropriation from the New York legislature

on the recommendation of the Governor, De Witt Clinton. Mr. Sage gave us

a description that night of the time his office was blown up with

dynamite thrown by a crank, and of his narrow escape. We found the great

financier and his wife in an unpretending cottage with a fine outlook on

the sea. Though possessed of great wealth they set a good example of

simplicity and economy, which many extravagant people would do well to

follow.

Having visited the World's Exposition at Chicago and attended a course

of lectures at Chautauqua, my daughter, Mrs. Stanton Lawrence, returned

to the city, and as soon as our apartment was in order I joined her. She

had recently been appointed Director of Physical Training at the

Teachers' College in New York city. I attended several of her

exhibitions and lectures, which were very interesting. She is doing her

best to develop, with proper exercises and sanitary dress, a new type of

womanhood.

My time passed pleasantly these days with a drive in the Park and an

hour in the land of Nod, also in reading Henry George's "Progress and

Poverty," William Morris on industrial questions, Stevenson's novels,

the "Heavenly Twins," and "Marcella," and at twilight, when I could not

see to read and write, in playing and singing the old tunes and songs I

loved in my youth. In the evening we played draughts and chess. I am

fond of all games, also of music and novels, hence the days fly swiftly

by; I am never lonely, life is ever very sweet to me and full of

interest.

The winter of 1893-94 was full of excitement, as the citizens of New

York were to hold a Constitutional Convention. Dr. Mary Putnam Jacobi

endeavored to rouse a new class of men and women to action in favor of

an amendment granting to women the right to vote. Appeals were sent

throughout the State, gatherings were held in parlors, and enthusiastic

meetings in Cooper Institute and at the Savoy Hotel. My daughter, Mrs.

Stanton Blatch, who was visiting this country, took an active part in

the canvass, and made an eloquent speech in Cooper Institute. Strange to

say, some of the leading ladies formed a strong party against the

proposed amendment and their own enfranchisement. They were called the

"Antis." This opposing organization adopted the same plan for the

campaign as those in favor of the amendment. They issued appeals,

circulated petitions, and had hearings before the Convention.

Mrs. Russell Sage, Mrs. Henry M. Sanders, Mrs. Edward Lauterbach, Mrs.

Runkle, and some liberal clergymen did their uttermost to secure the

insertion of the amendment in the proposed new constitution, but the

Committee on Suffrage of the Constitutional Convention refused even to

submit the proposed amendment to a vote of the people, though half a

million of our most intelligent and respectable citizens had signed the

petition requesting them to do so. Joseph H. Choate and Elihu Root did

their uttermost to defeat the amendment, and succeeded.

I spent the summer of 1894 with my son Gerrit, in his home at Thomaston,

Long Island. Balzac's novels, and the "Life of Thomas Paine" by Moncure

D. Conway, with the monthly magazines and daily papers, were my mental

pabulum. My daughter, Mrs. Stanton Lawrence, returned from England in

September, 1894, having had a pleasant visit with her sister in

Basingstoke. In December Miss Anthony came, and we wrote the woman

suffrage article for the new edition of Johnson's Cyclopedia.

On March 3, 1895, Lady Somerset and Miss Frances Willard, on the eve of

their departure for England, called to see me. We discussed my project

of a "Woman's Bible." They consented to join a revising committee, but

before the committee was organized they withdrew their names, fearing

the work would be too radical. I especially desired to have the opinions

of women from all sects, but those belonging to the orthodox churches

declined to join the committee or express their views. Perhaps they

feared their faith might be disturbed by the strong light of

investigation. Some half dozen members of the Revising Committee began

with me to write "Comments on the Pentateuch."

The chief thought revolving in my mind during the years of 1894 and 1895

had been "The Woman's Bible." In talking with friends I began to feel

that I might realize my long-cherished plan. Accordingly, I began to

read the commentators on the Bible and was surprised to see how little

they had to say about the greatest factor in civilization, the mother of

the race, and that little by no means complimentary. The more I read,

the more keenly I felt the importance of convincing women that the

Hebrew mythology had no special claim to a higher origin than that of

the Greeks, being far less attractive in style and less refined in

sentiment. Its objectionable features would long ago have been apparent

had they not been glossed over with a faith in their divine inspiration.

For several months I devoted all my time to Biblical criticism and

ecclesiastical history, and found no explanation for the degraded status

of women under all religions, and in all the so-called "Holy Books."

When Part I. of "The Woman's Bible" was finally published in November,

1895, it created a great sensation. Some of the New York city papers

gave a page to its review, with pictures of the commentators, of its

critics, and even of the book itself. The clergy denounced it as the

work of Satan, though it really was the work of Ellen Battelle Dietrick,

Lillie Devereux Blake, Rev. Phebe A. Hanaford, Clara Bewick Colby,

Ursula N. Gestefeld, Louisa Southworth, Frances Ellen Burr, and myself.

Extracts from it, and criticisms of the commentators, were printed in

the newspapers throughout America, Great Britain, and Europe. A third

edition was found necessary, and finally an edition was published in

England. The Revising Committee was enlarged, and it now consists of

over thirty of the leading women of America and Europe.[A]

The month of August, 1895, we spent in Peterboro, on the grand hills of

Madison County, nine hundred feet above the valley. Gerrit Smith's fine

old mansion still stands, surrounded with magnificent trees, where I had

played in childhood, chasing squirrels over lawn and gardens and wading

in a modest stream that still creeps slowly round the grounds. I

recalled as I sat on the piazza how one time, when Frederick Douglass

came to spend a few days at Peterboro, some Southern visitors wrote a

note to Mr. Smith asking if Mr. Douglass was to sit in the parlor and at

the dining table; if so, during his visit they would remain in their

own apartments. Mr. Smith replied that his visitors were always treated

by his family as equals, and such would be the case with Mr. Douglass,

who was considered one of the ablest men reared under "The Southern

Institution." So these ladies had their meals in their own apartments,

where they stayed most of the time, and, as Mr. Douglass prolonged his

visit, they no doubt wished in their hearts that they had never taken

that silly position. The rest of us walked about with him, arm in arm,

played games, and sang songs together, he playing the accompaniment on

the guitar. I suppose if our prejudiced countrywomen had been introduced

to Dumas in a French salon, they would at once have donned their bonnets

and ran away.

Sitting alone under the trees I recalled the different generations that

had passed away, all known to me. Here I had met the grandfather, Peter

Sken Smith, partner of John Jacob Astor. In their bargains with the

Indians they acquired immense tracts of land in the Northern part of the

State of New York, which were the nucleus of their large fortunes. I

have often heard Cousin Gerrit complain of the time he lost managing the

estate. His son Greene was an enthusiast in the natural sciences and

took but little interest in property matters. Later, his grandson,

Gerrit Smith Miller, assumed the burden of managing the estate and, in

addition, devoted himself to agriculture. He imported a fine breed of

Holstein cattle, which have taken the first prize at several fairs. His

son, bearing the same name, is devoted to the natural sciences, like his

uncle Greene; whose fine collection of birds was presented by his widow

to Harvard College.

The only daughter of Gerrit Smith, Elizabeth Smith Miller, is a

remarkable woman, possessing many of the traits of her noble father. She

has rare executive ability, as shown in the dispatch of her extensive

correspondence and in the perfect order of her house and grounds. She

has done much in the way of education, especially for the colored race,

in helping to establish schools and in distributing literature. She

subscribes for many of the best books, periodicals, and papers for

friends not able to purchase for themselves. We cannot estimate the good

she has done in this way. Every mail brings her letters from all

classes, from charitable institutions, prisons, Southern plantations,

army posts, and the far-off prairies. To all these pleas for help she

gives a listening ear. Her charities are varied and boundless, and her

hospitalities to the poor as well as the rich, courteous and generous.

The refinement and artistic taste of the Southern mother and the heroic

virtues of the father are happily blended in their daughter. In her

beautiful home on Seneca Lake, one is always sure to meet some of the

most charming representatives of the progressive thought of our times.

Representatives of all these generations now rest in the cemetery at

Peterboro, and as in review they passed before me they seemed to say,

"Why linger you here alone so long?"

My son Theodore arrived from Paris in September, 1895, and rendered most

important service during the preparations for my birthday celebration,

in answering letters, talking with reporters, and making valuable

suggestions to the managers as to many details in the arrangements, and

encouraging me to go through the ordeal with my usual heroism. I never

felt so nervous in my life, and so unfitted for the part I was in duty

bound to perform. From much speaking through many years my voice was

hoarse, from a severe fall I was quite lame, and as standing, and

distinct speaking are important to graceful oratory, I felt like the

king's daughter in Shakespeare's play of "Titus Andronicus," when rude

men who had cut her hands off and her tongue out, told her to call for

water and wash her hands. However, I lived through the ordeal, as the

reader will see in the next chapter.

After my birthday celebration, the next occasion of deep interest to me

was the Chicago Convention of 1896, the platform there adopted, and the

nomination and brilliant campaign of William J. Bryan. I had long been

revolving in my mind questions relating to the tariff and finance, and

in the demands of liberal democrats, populists, socialists, and the

laboring men and women, I heard the clarion notes of the coming

revolution.

During the winter of 1895-96 I was busy writing alternately on this

autobiography and "The Woman's Bible," and articles for magazines and

journals on every possible subject from Venezuela and Cuba to the

bicycle. On the latter subject many timid souls were greatly distressed.

Should women ride? What should they wear? What are "God's intentions"

concerning them? Should they ride on Sunday? These questions were asked

with all seriousness. We had a symposium on these points in one of the

daily papers. To me the answer to all these questions was simple--if

woman could ride, it was evidently "God's intention" that she be

permitted to do so. As to what she should wear, she must decide what is

best adapted to her comfort and convenience. Those who prefer a spin of

a few hours on a good road in the open air to a close church and a dull

sermon, surely have the right to choose, whether with trees and flowers

and singing birds to worship in "That temple not made with hands,

eternal in the heavens," or within four walls to sleep during the

intonation of that melancholy service that relegates us all, without

distinction of sex or color, to the ranks of "miserable sinners." Let

each one do what seemeth right in her own eyes, provided she does not

encroach on the rights of others.

In May, 1896, I again went to Geneva and found the bicycle craze had

reached there, with all its most pronounced symptoms; old and young,

professors, clergymen, and ladies of fashion were all spinning merrily

around on business errands, social calls, and excursions to distant

towns. Driving down the avenue one day, we counted eighty bicycles

before reaching the post-office. The ancient bandbox, so detested by our

sires and sons, has given place to this new machine which our daughters

take with them wheresoever they go, boxing and unboxing and readjusting

for each journey. It has been a great blessing to our girls in

compelling them to cultivate their self-reliance and their mechanical

ingenuity, as they are often compelled to mend the wheel in case of

accident. Among the visitors at Geneva were Mr. Douglass and his

daughter from the island of Cuba. They gave us very sad accounts of the

desolate state of the island and the impoverished condition of the

people. I had long felt that the United States should interfere in some

way to end that cruel warfare, for Spain has proved that she is

incompetent to restore order and peace.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote A: Part II. of "The Woman's Bible," which completes the work,

will be issued in January, 1898.]