← Table of ContentsLife of St. Francis of Assisi

CHAPTER I

YOUTH

Assisi is to-day very much what it was six or seven hundred years ago.

The feudal castle is in ruins, but the aspect of the city is just the

same. Its long-deserted streets, bordered by ancient houses, lie in

terraces half-way up the steep hill-side. Above it Mount Subasio[1]

proudly towers, at its feet lies outspread all the Umbrian plain from

Perugia to Spoleto. The crowded houses clamber up the rocks like

children a-tiptoe to see all that is to be seen; they succeed so well

that every window gives the whole panorama set in its frame of rounded

hills, from whose summits castles and villages stand sharply out against

a sky of incomparable purity.

These simple dwellings contain no more than five or six little

rooms,[2] but the rosy hues of the stone of which they are built give

them a wonderfully cheerful air. The one in which, according to the

story, St. Francis was born has almost entirely disappeared, to make

room for a church; but the street is so modest, and all that remains of

the _palazzo dei genitori di San Francesco_ is so precisely like the

neighboring houses that the tradition must be correct. Francis entered

into glory in his lifetime; it would be surprising if a sort of worship

had not from the first been centred around the house in which he saw the

light and where he passed the first twenty-five years of his life.

He was born about 1182.[3] The biographies have preserved to us few

details about his parents.[4] His father, Pietro Bernardone, was a

wealthy cloth-merchant. We know how different was the life of the

merchants of that period from what it is to-day. A great portion of

their time was spent in extensive journeys for the purchase of goods.

Such tours were little short of expeditions. The roads being insecure, a

strong escort was needed for the journey to those famous fairs where,

for long weeks at a time, merchants from the most remote parts of Europe

were gathered together. In certain cities, Montpellier for example, the

fair was perpetual. Benjamin of Tudela shows us that city frequented by

all nations, Christian and Mohammedan. "One meets there merchants from

Africa, from Italy, Egypt, Palestine, Greece, Gaul, Spain, and England,

so that one sees men of all languages, with the Genoese and the Pisans."

Among all these merchants the richest were those who dealt in textile

stuffs. They were literally the bankers of the time, and their heavy

wagons were often laden with the sums levied by the popes in England or

France.

Their arrival at a castle was one of the great events. They were kept as

long as possible, everyone being eager for the news they brought. It is

easy to understand how close must have been their relations with the

nobility; in certain countries, Provence for example, the merchants were

considered as nobles of a second order.[5]

Bernardone often made these long journeys; he went even as far as

France, and by this we must surely understand Northern France, and

particularly Champagne, which was the seat of commercial exchange

between Northern and Southern Europe.

He was there at the very time of his son's birth. The mother, presenting

the child at the font of San Rufino,[6] had him baptized by the name of

John, but the father on his return chose to call him Francis.[7] Had

he already determined on the education he was to give the child; did he

name him thus because he even then intended to bring him up after the

French fashion, to make a little Frenchman of him? It is by no means

improbable. Perhaps, indeed, the name was only a sort of grateful homage

tendered by the Assisan burgher to his noble clients beyond the Alps.

However this may be, the child was taught to speak French, and always

had a special fondness for both the language and the country.[8]

These facts about Bernardone are of real importance; they reveal the

influences in the midst of which Francis grew up. Merchants, indeed,

play a considerable part in the religious movements of the thirteenth

century. Their calling in some sense forced them to become colporters of

ideas. What else could they do, on arriving in a country, but answer

those who asked for news? And the news most eagerly looked for was

religious news, for men's minds were turned upon very different subjects

then from now. They accommodated themselves to the popular wish,

observing, hearkening everywhere, keeping eyes and ears open, glad to

find anything to tell; and little by little many of them became active

propagandists of ideas concerning which at first they had been simply

curious.

The importance of the part thus played by the merchants as they came

and went, everywhere sowing the new ideas which they had gathered up in

their travels, has not been put in a clear enough light; they were

often, unconsciously and quite involuntarily, the carriers of ideas of

all kinds, especially of heresy and rebellion. It was they who made the

success of the Waldenses, the Albigenses, the Humiliati, and many other

sects.

Thus Bernardone, without dreaming of such a thing, became the artisan of

his son's religious vocation. The tales which he brought home from his

travels seemed at first, perhaps, not to have aroused the child's

attention, but they were like germs a long time buried, which suddenly,

under a warm ray of sunlight, bring forth unlooked-for fruit.

The boy's education was not carried very far;[9] the school was in

those days overshadowed by the church. The priests of San Giorgio were

his teachers,[10] and taught him a little Latin. This language was

spoken in Umbria until toward the middle of the thirteenth century;

every one understood it and spoke it a little; it was still the language

of sermons and of political deliberations.[11]

He learned also to write, but with less success; all through his life we

see him take up the pen only on rare occasions, and for but a few

words.[12] The autograph of Sacro-Convento, which appears to be

entirely authentic, shows extreme awkwardness; in general he dictated,

signing his letters by a simple [Greek: tau], the symbol of the cross of

Jesus.[13]

That part of his education which was destined to have most influence

upon his life was the French language,[14] which he perhaps spoke in his

own family. It has been rightly said that to know two languages is to

have two souls; in learning that of France the boy felt his heart thrill

to the melody of its youthful poetry, and his imagination was

mysteriously stirred with dreams of imitating the exploits of the French

cavaliers.

But let us not anticipate. His early life was that of other children of

his age. In the quarter of the town where his house is still shown no

vehicles are ever seen; from morning till night the narrow streets are

given over to the children. They play there in many groups, frolicking

with an exquisite charm, very different from the little Romans, who,

from the time they are six or seven years old, spend hours at a time

squatting behind a pillar, or in a corner of a wall or a ruin, to play

dice or "morra," putting a passionate ferocity even into their play.

In Umbria, as in Tuscany, children love above all things games in which

they can make a parade; to play at soldiers or procession is the supreme

delight of Assisan children. Through the day they keep to the narrow

streets, but toward evening they go, singing and dancing, to one of the

open squares of the city. These squares are one of the charms of Assisi.

Every few paces an interval occurs between the houses looking toward the

plain, and you find a delightful terrace, shaded by a few trees, the

very place for enjoying the sunset without losing one of its splendors.

Hither no doubt came often the son of Bernardone, leading one of those

_farandoles_ which you may see there to this day: from his very babyhood

he was a prince among the children.

Thomas of Celano draws an appalling picture of the education of that

day. He describes parents inciting their children to vice, and driving

them by main force to wrong-doing. Francis responded only too quickly to

these unhappy lessons.[15]

His father's profession and the possibly noble origin of his mother

raised him almost to the level of the titled families of the country;

money, which he spent with both hands, made him welcome among them. Well

pleased to enjoy themselves at his expense, the young nobles paid him a

sort of court. As to Bernardone, he was too happy to see his son

associating with them to be niggardly as to the means. He was miserly,

as the course of this history will show, but his pride and self-conceit

exceeded his avarice.

Pica, his wife, gentle and modest creature,[16] concerning whom the

biographers have been only too laconic, saw all this, and mourned over

it in silence, but though weak as mothers are, she would not despair of

her son, and when the neighbors told her of Francis's escapades, she

would calmly reply, "What are you thinking about? I am very sure that,

if it pleases God, he will become a good Christian."[17] The words were

natural enough from a mother's lips, but later on they were held to have

been truly prophetic.

How far did the young man permit himself to be led on? It would be

difficult to say. The question which, as we are told, tormented Brother

Leo, could only have suggested itself to a diseased imagination.[18]

Thomas of Celano and the Three Companions agree in picturing him as

going to the worst excesses. Later biographers speak with more

circumspection of his worldly career. A too widely credited story

gathered from Celano's narrative was modified by the chapter-general of

1260,[19] and the frankness of the early biographers was, no doubt, one

of the causes which most effectively contributed to their definitive

condemnation three years later.[20]

Their statements are in no sense obscure; according to them the son of

Bernardone not only patterned himself after the young men of his age, he

made it a point of honor to exceed them. What with eccentricities,

buffooneries, pranks, prodigalities, he ended by achieving a sort of

celebrity. He was forever in the streets with his companions, compelling

attention by his extravagant or fantastic attire. Even at night the

joyous company kept up their merrymakings, causing the town to ring

with their noisy songs.[21]

At this very time the troubadours were roaming over the towns of

Northern Italy[22] and bringing brilliant festivities and especially

Courts of Love into vogue. If they worked upon the passions, they also

made appeal to feelings of courtesy and delicacy; it was this that saved

Francis. In the midst of his excesses he was always refined and

considerate, carefully abstaining from every base or indecent

utterance.[23] Already his chief aspiration was to rise above the

commonplace. Tortured with the desire for that which is far off and

high,[24] he had conceived a sort of passion for chivalry, and fancying

that dissipation was one of the distinguishing features of nobility, he

had thrown himself into it with all his soul.

But he who, at twenty, goes from pleasure to pleasure with the heart not

absolutely closed to good, must now and then, at some turning of the

road, become aware that there are hungry folk, who could live a month on

what he spends in a few hours on frivolity. Francis saw them, and with

his impressionable nature for the moment forgot everything else. In

thought he put himself in their place, and it sometimes happened that he

gave them all the money he had about him and even his clothes.

One day he was busy with some customers in his father's shop, when a man

came in, begging for charity in the name of God. Losing his patience

Francis sharply turned him away; but quickly reproaching himself for his

harshness he thought, "What would I not have done if this man had asked

something of me in the name of a count or a baron? What ought I not to

have done when he came in the name of God? I am no better than a clown!"

Leaving his customers he ran after the beggar.[25]

Bernardone had been well pleased with his son's commercial aptitude in

the early days when the young man was first in his father's employ.

Francis was only too proficient in spending money; he at least knew well

how to make it.[26] But this satisfaction did not last long. Francis's

bad companions were exercising over him a most pernicious influence. The

time came when he could no longer endure to be separated from them; if

he heard their call, nothing could keep him, he would leave everything

and go after them.[27]

All this time political events were hurrying on in Umbria and Italy;

after a formidable struggle the allied republics had forced the empire

to recognize them. By the immortal victory of Legnano (May 29, 1176) and

the Peace of Constance (June 25, 1183) the Lombard League had wrested

from Frederick Barbarossa almost all the prerogatives of power; little

was left to the emperor but insignia and outward show.

From one end of the Peninsula to the other visions of liberty were

making hearts beat high. For an instant it seemed as if all Italy was

about to regain consciousness of its unity, was about to rise up as one

man and hurl the foreigner from its borders; but the rivalries of the

cities were too strong for them to see that local liberty without a

common independence is precarious and illusory. Henry VI., the successor

of Barbarossa (1183-1196), laid Italy under a yoke of iron; he might

perhaps in the end have assured the domination of the empire, if his

career had not been suddenly cut short by a premature death.

Yet he had not been able to put fetters upon ideas. The communal

movement which was shaking the north of France reverberated beyond the

Alps.

Although a city of second rank, Assisi had not been behind in the great

struggles for independence.[28] She had been severely chastised, had

lost her franchise, and was obliged to submit to Conrad of Suabia, Duke

of Spoleto, who from the heights of his fortress kept her in subjection.

But when Innocent III. ascended the pontifical throne (January 8, 1199)

the old duke knew himself to be lost. He made a tender to him of money,

men, his faith even, but the pontiff refused them all. He had no desire

to appear to favor the Tedeschi, who had so odiously oppressed the

country. Conrad of Suabia was forced to yield at mercy, and to go to

Narni to put his submission into the hands of two cardinals.

Like the practical folk that they were, the Assisans did not hesitate an

instant. No sooner was the count on the road to Narni than they rushed

to the assault of the castle. The arrival of envoys charged to take

possession of it as a pontifical domain by no means gave them pause. Not

one stone of it was left upon another.[29] Then, with incredible

rapidity they enclosed their city with walls, parts of which are still

standing, their formidable ruins a witness to the zeal with which the

whole population labored on them.

It is natural to think that Francis, then seventeen years old, was one

of the most gallant laborers of those glorious days, and it was perhaps

there that he gained the habit of carrying stones and wielding the

trowel which was destined to serve him so well a few years later.

Unhappily his fellow-citizens had not the sense to profit by their

hard-won liberty. The lower classes, who in this revolution had become

aware of their strength, determined to follow out the victory by taking

possession of the property of the nobles. The latter took refuge in

their fortified houses in the interior of the city, or in their castles

in the suburbs. The townspeople burned down several of the latter,

whereupon counts and barons made request of aid and succor from the

neighboring cities.

Perugia was at this time at the apogee of its power,[30] and had already

made many efforts to reduce Assisi to submission. It therefore received

the fugitives with alacrity, and making their cause its own, declared

war upon Assisi. This was in 1202. An encounter took place in the plain

about half way between the two cities, not far from _Ponte San

Giovanni_. Assisi was defeated, and Francis, who was in the ranks, was

made prisoner.[31]

The treachery of the nobles had not been universal; a few had fought

with the people. It was with them and not with the _popolani_ that

Francis, in consideration of the nobility of his manners,[32] passed the

time of his captivity, which lasted an entire year. He greatly

astonished his companions by his lightness of heart. Very often they

thought him almost crazy. Instead of passing his time in wailing and

cursing he made plans for the future, about which he was glad to talk to

any one who came along. To his fancy life was what the songs of the

troubadours had painted it; he dreamed of glorious adventures, and

always ended by saying: "You will see that one day I shall be adored by

the whole world."[33]

During these long months Francis must have been pretty rudely undeceived

with respect to those nobles whom from afar he had so heartily admired.

However that may be, he retained with them not only his frankness of

speech, but also his full freedom of action. One of them, a knight, had

always held aloof from the others, out of vanity and bad temper.

Francis, far from leaving him to himself, always showed him affection,

and finally had the joy of reconciling him with his fellow-captives.

A compromise was finally arrived at between the counts and the people of

Assisi. In November, 1203, the arbitrators designated by the two parties

announced their decision. The commons of Assisi were to repair in a

certain measure the damage done to the lords, and the latter agreed, on

their part, to make no further alliances without authorization of the

commons.[34] Rural serfage was maintained, which proves that the

revolution had been directed by the burghers, and for their own profit.

Ten years more were not, however, to elapse before the common people

also would succeed in achieving liberty. In this cause we shall again

see Francis fighting on the side of the oppressed, earning the title of

_Patriarch of religious democracy_ which has been accorded him by one of

his compatriots.[35]

The agreement being made the prisoners detained at Perugia were

released, and Francis returned to Assisi. He was twenty-two years old.

FOOTNOTES:

[1] Eleven hundred and one metres above the level of the sea;

the plain around Assisi has an average of two hundred, and the

town of two hundred and fifty, metres above.

[2] As in the majority of Tuscan cities the dimensions of the

houses were formerly fixed by law.

[3] The biographies say that he died (October 3, 1226) in his

forty-fifth year. But the terms are not precise enough to make

the date 1181 improbable. For that matter the question is of

small importance. A Franciscan of Erfurt, about the middle of

the thirteenth century, fixes the date at 1182. Pertz, vol.

xxiv., p. 193.

[4] A number of different genealogies have been fabricated for

Francis; they prove only one thing, the wreck of the Franciscan

idea. How little they understood their hero, who thought to

magnify and glorify him by making him spring from a noble

family! "_Quæ rero_," says Father Suysken, S. J., "_de ejus

gentilitio insigni disserit Waddingus, non lubet mihi attingere.

Factis et virtutibus eluxit S. Franciscus non proavorum

insignibus aut titulis, quos nec desideravit_." (A. SS. p.

557a.) It could not be better said.

In the fourteenth century a whole cycle of legends had gathered

about his birth. It could not have been otherwise. They all grow

out of the story that tells of an old man who comes knocking at

the parents' door, begging them to let him take the infant in

his arms, when he announces that it will do great things. Under

this form the episode certainly presents nothing impossible, but

very soon marvellous incidents begin to gather around this

nucleus until it becomes unrecognizable. Bartholomew of Pisa has

preserved it in almost its primitive form. _Conform_., 28a 2.

Francis certainly had several brothers [3 Soc., 9. _Mater_ ...

_quæ cum præ ceteris filiis diligebat_], but they have left no

trace in history except the incident related farther on. Vide p.

44. Christofani publishes several official pieces concerning

_Angelo_, St. Francis's brother, and his descendants: _Storie

d'Assisi_, vol. i., p. 78 ff. In these documents Angelo is called

_Angelus Pice_, and his son _Johannectus olim Angeli domine

Pice_, appellations which might be cited in favor of the noble

origin of Pica.

[5] Documentary History of Languedoc, iii., p. 607.

[6] The Cathedral of Assisi. To this day all the children of the

town are baptized there; the other churches are without fonts.

[7] 3 Soc., 1; 2 Cel., 1, 1. Vide also 3 Soc., edition of

Pesaro, 1831.

[8] The _langue d'oïl_ was at this epoch the international

language of Europe; in Italy it was the language of games and

tourneys, and was spoken in the petty princely courts of

Northern Italy. Vide Dante, _De vulgari eloquio_, lib. I., cap.

x. Brunetto Latini wrote in French because "the speech of France

is more delectable and more common to all people." At the other

end of Europe the Abbot of Stade, in Westphalia, spoke of the

_nobility of the Gallic dialect_. _Ann._ 1224 _apud_ Pertz,

Script. xvi. We shall find St. Francis often making allusions to

the tales of the Round Table and the _Chanson de Roland_.

[9] We must not be led astray by certain remarks upon his

ignorance, from which one might at first conclude that he knew

absolutely nothing; for example, 2 Cel., 3, 45: _Quamvis homo

iste beatus nullis fuerit scientiæ studiis innutritus_. This

evidently refers to science such as the Franciscans soon came to

apprehend it, and to theology in particular.

The close of the passage in Celano is itself an evident proof of

this.

[10] Bon., 219; Cf. A. SS., p. 560a. 1 Cel., 23.

[11] Ozanam, _Documents inédits pour servir à l'histoire

littéraire d'Italie du VIIIe au XIIIe siècle_. Paris, 1851, 8vo,

pp. 65, 68, 71, 73. Fauriel, _Dante et les origines de la

littérature italienne_. Paris, 1854, 2 vols., 8vo, ii., p. 332,

379, 429.

[12] V. 3 Soc., 51 and 67; 2 Cel., 3, 110; Bon., 55; 2 Cel., 3,

99; Eccl., 6. Bernard de Besse, Turin MS., fo. 96a, calls

Brother Leo the secretary of St. Francis.

[13] See page 357, n. 8. Bon., 51 and 308.

[14] 1 Cel., 16; 3 Soc., 10; 23; 24; 33; 2 Cel., 1, 8; 3, 67.

See also the Testament of St. Clara and the Speculum, 119a.

[15] _Primum namque cum fari vel balbutire incipiunt, turpia

quædam et execrabilia valde signis et vocibus edocentur pueri ii

nondum nati: et cum tempus ablactationis advenerit quædam luxu

et lascivia plena non solum fari sed et operari coguntur.... Sed

et cum paulo plusculum ætate profecerint, se ipsis impellentibus,

semper ad deteriora opera dilabuntur._ 1 Cel., 1.

[16] 2 Cel., 1. Cf. _Conform._, 14a, 1. There is nothing

impossible in her having been of Provençal origin, but there is

nothing to indicate it in any document worthy of credence. She

was no doubt of noble stock, for official documents always give

her the title _Domina_. Cristofani I., p. 78 ff. Cf. _Matrem

honestissimam habuit_. 3 Soc., Edition of Pesaro, 1831, p. 17.

[17] The reading given by the _Conform_., 14a, 1, _Meritorum

gratia dei filium ipsum noveritis affuturum_, seems better than

that of 2 Cel., 1, 1, _Multorum gratia Dei filiorum patrem ipsum

noveritis affuturum_. Cf. 3 Soc., 2.

[18] Bernardo of Besse, Turin MS., 102 b.: _An integer carne

desiderans ... quod non extorsisset a Sancto ... meruit obtinere

a Deo quod virgo esset_. Cf. _Conform_., 211a, 1, and A. SS., p.

560f.

[19] "_In illa antiphona quæ incipit: Hic vir in vanitatibus

nutritus insolenter, fiat talis mutatis: Divinis karismatibus

preventus est clementer." Archiv._, vi., p. 35.

[20] Vide p. 395, the decision of the chapter of 1263 ordaining

the destruction of legends earlier than that of Bonaventura.

[21] 1 Cel., 1 and 2; 89; 3 Soc., 2. Cf. A. SS., 560c. Vincent

of Beauvais, _Spec. hist. lib._, 29, cap. 97.

[22] Pierre Vidal was at the court of Boniface, Marquis of

Montferrat, about 1195, and liked his surroundings so well that

he desired to establish himself there. K. Bartsch, _Piere

Vidal's Lieder_, Berlin, 1857, n. 41. Ern. Monaci, _Testi

antichi provenzali_, Rome, 1889, col. 67. One should read this

piece to have an idea of the fervor with which this poet shared

the hopes of Italy and desired its independence. This political

note is found again in a _tenzon_ of Manfred II. Lancia,

addressed to Pierre Vidal. (V. Monaci, _loc. cit._, col.

68.)--Gaucelme Faidit was also at this court as well as Raimbaud

of Vacqueyras (1180-1207).--Folquet de Romans passed nearly all

his life in Italy. Bernard of Ventadour (1145-1195), Peirol of

Auvergne (1180-1220), and many others abode there a longer or

shorter time. Very soon the Italians began to sing in Provençal,

among others this Manfred Lancia, and Albert Marquis of

Malaspina (1162-1210), Pietro della Caravana, who in 1196

stirred up the Lombard towns against Henry VI., Pietro della

Mula, who about 1200 was at the court of Cortemiglia. Fragments

from these poets may be found in Monaci, _op. cit._, col. 69 ff.

[23] Soc., 3; 2 Cel., 1, 1.

[24] _Cum esset gloriosus animo et nollet aliquem se

præcellere_, Giord. 20.

[25] 1 Cel., 17; 3 Soc., 3; Bon., 7. Cf. A. SS., p. 562.

[26] 1 Cel., 2; Bon., 6; _Vit. sec. apud_, A. SS., p. 560.

[27] 3 Soc., 9.

[28] In 1174 Assisi was taken by the chancellor of the empire,

Christian, Archbishop of Mayence. A. Cristofani, i., p. 69.

[29] All these events are related in the _Gesta Innocentii III.

ab auctore coætaneo_, edited by Baluze: Migne, _Inn. op._, vol.

i., col. xxiv. See especially the letter of Innocent,

_Rectoribus Tusciæ: Mirari cogimur_, of April 16, 1198. Migne,

vol. i., col. 75-77. Potthast, No. 82.

[30] See Luigi Bonazzi, _Storia di Perugia_, 2 vols., 8vo.

Perugia, 1875-1879 vol. i., cap. v., pp. 257-322.

[31] 3 Soc., 4; 2 Cel., 1, 1. Cristofani, _op. cit._, i., p. 88

ff.; Bonazzi, _op. cit._, p. 257.

[32] 3 Soc., 4.

[33] 3 Soc., 4; 2 Cel., 1, 1.

[34] See this arbitration in Cristofani, _op. cit._, p. 93 ff.

[35] Cristofani, _loc. cit._, p. 70.

* * * * *