Chapter XVII
_Bars and Barkeepers_
In the old days on the river, whiskey was not classed as one of the
luxuries. It was regarded as one of the necessities, if not the
prime necessity, of life. To say that everybody drank would not be
putting much strain upon the truth, for the exceptions were so few as
scarcely to be worth counting. It was a saying on the river that if a
man owned a bar on a popular packet, it was better than possessing a
gold mine. The income was ample and certain, and the risk and labor
slight. Men who owned life leases of steamboat bars willed the same
to their sons, as their richest legacies. Ingenious and far-seeing
men set about accumulating bars as other men invested in two, three,
or four banks, or factories.
"Billy" Henderson of St. Louis was the first financier to become a
trust magnate in bars. He owned the one on the "Excelsior", on which
boat he ran between St. Louis and St. Paul. Later, he bought the
lease of the bar on the "Metropolitan", and still later, when the
Northern Line was organized, he bought the bars on all the boats,
putting trusty "bar-keeps" aboard each, he himself keeping a general
oversight of the whole, and rigorously exacting a mean average of
returns from each, based upon the number of passengers carried. This
system of averages included men, women, and children, and "Indians
not taxed", presupposing that a certain percentage of the passengers'
money would find its way into his tills, regardless of age, sex, or
color. What his judgment would have been had one of the craft been
chartered to carry a Sunday school picnic from St. Louis to St.
Paul, will never be known. Such an exigency never confronted him, in
those days. The judgment rendered was, that he was not far off in
his conclusions as to the average income from the average class of
passengers carried.
Ordinarily, the bartenders were young men "of parts". None of them,
so far as I know, were college graduates; but then college graduates
were then mighty few in the West in any calling--and there were
bars in plenty. It was required by their employers that they be
pleasant and agreeable fellows, well dressed, and well mannered.
They must know how to concoct a few of the more commonplace fancy
drinks affected by the small number of travellers who wished such
beverage--whiskey cocktails for the Eastern trade, and mint juleps
for the Southern. The plain, everyday Western man took his whiskey
straight, four fingers deep, and seldom spoiled the effect of his
drink by pouring water on top of it. The "chaser" had not, at that
early day, become fashionable, and in times of extreme low water it
was not permitted that water should be wasted in that manner when all
was required for purposes of navigation.
The barkeeper was also supposed to know how to manufacture a
choice brand of French brandy, by the judicious admixture of burnt
peach stones, nitric acid, and cod-liver oil, superimposed upon a
foundation of Kentucky whiskey three weeks from the still. He did it,
too; but judicious drinkers again took theirs straight, and lived the
longest.
I flatter myself that I can recall the name of but one bartender with
whom I sailed. While I had no very strong scruples about drinking
or selling liquor, I seldom patronized the bar beyond the purchase
of cigars and an occasional soft drink. I remember one dispenser,
however, from his short but exceedingly stormy experience on the
"Fanny Harris". He was an Irish lad, about twenty or twenty-one years
of age, and not very large. He was sent on board by the lessee of the
bar, who lived in Dubuque.
Charley Hargus, our chief clerk, did not like the Irish. He had
personal reasons for disliking some member of that nationality, and
this dislike he handed on to all its other members with whom he came
in contact. There were no Irishmen among the officers of the "Fanny
Harris", and when Donnelly came aboard to take charge of the bar
Hargus strongly objected, but without avail. He then set himself
about the task of making life so uncomfortable for the lad that he
would be sure to transfer to some other boat, or quit altogether,
an end accomplished within three months. The process afforded rare
amusement to such witnesses as happened to see the fun, but there
was no fun in it for Donnelly; and in later years, when I came to
think it over, my sympathy went out to the poor fellow, who suffered
numberless indignities at the hands of his tireless persecutor. If
Donnelly--who was not at all a bad fellow, was earning his living
honestly, and never did anything to injure Hargus--had had the spirit
common to most river men in those days, he would have shot the chief
clerk and few could have blamed him.
Bars are not looked upon with the same favor in our day, as in the
past. It is claimed that upon some of the boats plying upon the
upper river there are now no bars at all. If a person thinks he
must have liquor on the trip, he must take it with his baggage. It
is further credibly asserted that many of the officers handling the
steamers are teetotalers; further, that there is no more profit in
the bar business, and that investors in that kind of property are
becoming scarce. Modern business conditions are responsible for much
of the change that has taken place, especially in the transportation
business, within the last twenty-five years. Railroad and steamboat
managers do not care to intrust their property to the care of
drinking men, and it is becoming more and more difficult for such to
secure positions of responsibility. As the display of liquor in an
open bar might be a temptation to some men, otherwise competent and
trusty officers, the owners are adopting the only consistent course,
and are banishing the bar from their boats.
This does not apply in all cases, however. A few years ago I took a
trip from St. Paul to St. Louis on one of the boats of the Diamond
Jo Line. There was a bar on the boat, but it seemed to depend for
its patronage upon the colored deck crew. They were pretty constant
patrons, although their drinking was systematically regulated. A side
window, opening out upon the boiler deck promenade, was devoted to
the deck traffic. If a rouster wanted a drink he must apply to one
of the mates, who issued a brass check, good for a glass of whiskey,
which the deck hand presented at the bar, and got his drink. When pay
day came, the barkeeper in his turn presented his bundle of checks
and took in the cash. How many checks were issued to each man on the
trip from St. Louis to St. Paul and return, I do not know; but it
is safe to say that the sum total was not permitted to exceed the
amount of wages due the rouster. Some of the "niggers" probably had
coming to them more checks than cash, at the close of the voyage. The
regulation was effective in preventing excess, which would demoralize
the men and render them less valuable in "humping" freight.
The bartender always poured out the whiskey for the "coons", and for
the latter it was not a big drink. It was, likewise, not a good drink
for a white man, being a pretty tough article of made-up stuff, that
would burn a hole in a sheet-iron stove. If it had been less fiery
the rousters would have thought they were being cheated.
While on this trip, I never saw an officer of the boat take a
drink at the bar, or anywhere else, and but few of the passengers
patronized it. It accentuated as much as any other one thing the fact
that the "good old times" on the river were gone, and that a higher
civilization had arisen. But peddling cheap whiskey to "niggers"!
What would an old-time bartender have thought of that? The bare
insinuation would have thrown him into a fit. But we are all on an
equality now, black and white--before the bar.
[Illustration: WINONA, MINNESOTA. The Levee in 1862.]