CHAPTER XIV.
UNREST–MESSENGERS AND WAR PARTIES SENT OUT–ATTACK ON THE SIOUX–THEY
RETALIATE–ATTACK ON THE MENOMINEES–A COUNCIL.
The Sioux and Sacs and Foxes had been enemies for generations. Predatory
excursions by each nation into the other’s country had decimated the
ranks of both, until the Government found it necessary to interfere and
demand a treaty of peace between them. Accordingly, on the 19 of August,
1825, William Clark and Lewis Cass, as commissioners on behalf of the
United States, met representatives from the Chippewas, Sacs and Foxes,
Sioux, Menominees, Winnebagoes, Iowas and portions of the Ottawas and
Pottowattomies at Prairie du Chien, where the first step toward a
general peace was taken by making a treaty wherein it was finally agreed
(Article 2) that the United States should run a boundary line between
the Sioux on the north and the Sacs and Foxes on the south, as follows:
Commencing at the mouth of Upper Iowa River, on the west bank of the
Mississippi, and ascending said Iowa River to its left fork; thence up
the fork to its source; thence crossing the fork of Red Cedar River in a
direct line to the second or upper fork of the Des Moines River; thence
in a direct line to the lower fork of the Calumet (Big Sioux) River, and
down that river to its junction with the Missouri River.[84]
Article 1 provided for a perpetual peace between the Sioux and Chippewas
and confederated tribes of Sacs and Foxes and between the Iowas and
Sioux.
Article 7 determined the boundaries of the Winnebago country in Illinois
and Wisconsin, most of which, including the lead mines, the Sacs and
Foxes had claimed and ceded by the treaty of 1804, and which fact, when
considered, brings the consideration for the lands actually acquired
within reason.
Article 9 defined the boundaries of the territory of the Ottawas,
Chippewas and Pottowattomies, none of which the Sacs and Foxes ever
owned, though they conveyed it by the treaty of 1804.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Illustration: GEN. JOSEPH M. STREET.]
[Illustration: GEN. LEWIS CASS.]
[Illustration: JEFFERSON BARRACKS.]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This treaty of 1825, recognizing the right of the United States to
sundry other lands theretofore ceded by the Sacs and Foxes, over which
they had some shadow of authority, drew the line immediately north of
the Black Hawk village,[85] and this fact may have caused the impression
by some of the Indians, designedly or otherwise, that the treaty of 1804
contained the same stipulation.
By Article 10 “all the tribes aforesaid acknowledge the general
controlling power of the United States, and disclaim all dependence upon
and connection with any other power.”
Evidently the pact relating to peace between the Sioux and Sacs and
Foxes had been avoided or disputed by one or both the subscribing
parties, for on July 15th, 1830, at Prairie du Chien, it became
necessary to call another council and make another treaty whereby the
Sacs and Foxes ceded to the United States a strip of country twenty
miles in width, lying south of the line established by the treaty of
August 19, 1825, and extending along on the south side of said line from
the Mississippi to the Des Moines. In the same treaty the Sioux ceded to
the United States a like strip twenty miles wide, extending along the
north side of said line from the Mississippi to the Des Moines. This
forty-mile strip was known as the “Neutral Ground,” into which the
tribes on either side of the line were allowed to enter and hunt and
fish unmolested.
Unmindful of these treaties, however, we find a war party of Sacs and
Foxes, in 1831, near the headwaters of Blue Earth River, pouncing upon
some unoffending Sioux and murdering two of them in cold blood,[86] as
will be seen by the following:
“Indian Agency, St. Peters,
“August 8, 1831.
“General:–What I have always feared and what has been predicted by me,
in the most decided form, has recently taken place. The Sac or Fox
Indians, about forty, invaded the Sioux territory on or about the 25th
of last month (July). These were _mounted men_, who penetrated the
country as far as Cintajah, or the Grey Tail, near the headwaters of
the Terre Blue River, which is a tributary of the St. Peter’s, and
contiguous to this post. _There is no mistake; the Sac Indians have
killed_ two of the most respectable men of the Wahpakoota Sioux, at
the time and place above stated, and this, too, at least _sixty miles
from the ceded territory_, as concluded upon at the treaty of July,
1830, at Prairie du Chien. The Wahpakootas ask for immediate redress,
and I beg leave to assure you that the sooner their _just_
expectations in this important matter be met, the better for _me_ and
for this country. I mean after what was promised by the Government,
through the commissioners, at the treaty of 1830, in presence of the
assembled tribes. The Sacs lost one man in their attack upon the
Sioux, who were in sight of their encampment at the time.
“I have written to Col. Morgan, or officer commanding the troops at
Prairie du Chien, a copy of which letter is herewith enclosed. I have
not gone much into detail, as the matter in question does not admit of
delay. The _traders_ must lose $20,000 worth of credits already given
for the country in possession of the Wahpakootas, if the present
difficulty be not very speedily adjusted. I have the honor to be, with
the highest respect, sir, your obedient servant,
“LAW. TALIAFERRO,
“Indian Agent, St. Peters.
“GENERAL WILLIAM CLARK,
“Superintendent of Indian Affairs.”
“Indian Agency, St. Peters, August 12, 1831.
“General:–I declined sending off my express on the 8th inst.,
understanding that one of the Wahpakoota chiefs would be here in a day
or two. Tah-sau-gah-now, the principal chief, reached this place last
night, and confirms the statement made to you on the 8th as to the
attack of the Sac Indians upon his people. He desires me to say to
you, that in a few days you may expect to hear of a number more of his
people losing their scalps, as there was considerable firing heard in
the direction of the camp of the second chief, from whom he had
separated but the day previous. The Sacs scalped the two Sioux, after
which their bodies, together with the Sac killed in the conflict, were
buried by the Wahpakootas. The chief wishes me to state further to
you, that it is his intention, at my earnest request, to remain quiet
until the first of October, when, if the Government settles the
difficulty as declared at the treaty of Prairie du Chien, his people
will be satisfied; otherwise, they will, with all their force, carry
the war into the Sac country to protect themselves. He also states
that he has a heart, and it is hard for him to see his people shot
down like the buffalo on the lands acknowledged by all nations to
belong to them. I have the honor to be, with high respect, sir, your
obedient servant,
“LAW. TALIAFERRO,
“Indian Agent, St. Peters.
“GENERAL WILLIAM CLARK,
“Superintendent of Indian Affairs at St. Louis.”
Notwithstanding the promise to wait, this unprovoked attack aroused
other bands of the Sioux, who lost no time avenging the act in the
following manner: A band of the Foxes living near the Dubuque mines had
made an engagement to meet the agent at Prairie du Chien. Learning of
this contemplated visit, one John Marsh informed the Sioux of the time
and place thereof. Between midnight and the morning of the day fixed for
the approach of the Foxes, a band of Sioux, which had been joined by a
few young Menominees, passed down the river some twelve or fifteen miles
below Prairie du Chien, where a thick growth of bushes afforded ample
opportunity for an ambush. The channel there was narrow, with less
current than a broader, and was the one always selected by Indians for
voyaging upon the river. Kettle, the Fox chief, was leading his party up
the channel in person, when, passing the point of bushes there, the
Sioux and Menominees opened fire, killing Kettle and several of his
followers. The frightened Foxes fled to their Dubuque village, while the
Sioux and Menominees returned home to dance over the event.
No action was taken against them by the authorities, for the reason,
perhaps, that the act was retaliatory, _lex talionis_ being the law of
the Indian, treaty or no treaty.[87]
Black Hawk, after his fiasco of 1831, had retired to the west side of
the Mississippi. He had agreed to remain tranquil; his people had been
provided with enough to maintain a provident band through the ensuing
winter, but no sooner had the soldiers dispersed than he began fomenting
trouble, and trying, as he had tried in 1831, to form a confederacy to
fight the whites. War parties of various sizes were soon on foot to stir
up trouble with those Indians then known to be on good terms with the
whites, as will be set forth in the correspondence which I have seen fit
to copy in full rather than make extracts.
“Cantonment Leavenworth, July 29, 1831.
“Sir:–Last night two young men of the Ioway tribe arrived at this post
on express for the purpose of informing me that about 120 Sacs from
the Mississippi, in three different war parties, were on the way up
the Mississippi in search of the Ottoes, Omahas or Sioux. I
immediately sent off a runner to apprise all the Indians above this,
and put them on their guard. One of these parties passed the Ioway
village, proceeded on, and crossed the Missouri at the Black Snake
Hills, and are now on this side somewhere above this place. Four men
of this last party turned back from the Ioway village and bore off
with them two horses belonging to one of our citizens in Clay county.
I understand the whites have pursued them.
“On the 21st instant, 32 Sacs from Rock River passed this point on
their way to the Osage towns. They were accompanied by two Osages, one
of whom called himself the son of Clament. I think it highly probable
that these Rock River Sacs will give us much trouble in this quarter.
I have the honor, etc.,
“JOHN DOUGHERTY,
“Indian Agent.
“To GEN. WM. CLARK,
Supt. Indian Affairs.”
On July 30th, 1831, a band of Menominees, having business with the agent
at Prairie du Chien, was assembled on an island almost under the guns of
the fort. Menominees loved whisky, and these Indians drank themselves
socially full, carrying their revels far into the night, when further
drinking put them entirely _hors de combat_. About two hours before
daylight of the 31st a war party of Sacs and Foxes, which had been
watching the debauch, fell upon the helpless Menominees, killed
twenty-five of them outright and wounded others. A few, less confused by
liquor, roused themselves and pursued the Sacs and Foxes a short
distance without doing more damage than wounding a few. The women,
fearing possible harm to each other, had hidden all the firearms to be
found, thus leaving the Menominees doubly insecure.
The Sacs and Foxes fled direct to Black Hawk’s camp, and about that
individual secreted themselves beyond discovery.
Those Menominees, while lovers of whisky, were pronounced by Hon. James
H. Lockwood, who was present at Prairie du Chien at the time, and who
was intimately acquainted with Menominee character, to be, with
surprisingly few exceptions, a quiet, peaceable race, Tomah, the then
acting chief, occupying in Menominee annals a high character for ability
and exemplary enterprises.
“United States Indian Agency,
At Prairie du Chien, August 1, 1831.
“Sir:–One year had scarcely elapsed after the sealing of the treaty of
1830 at this place, before one of the parties has broken its solemn
engagements, and dyed the scene of the ratification in the blood of
those Indians whom they took by the hand in the presence of their
great father’s commissioners.
“Two or three hours before day, on the morning of the 31st July, a
party consisting of 80 or 100 Sacs and Foxes surprised a Menominee
camp, three or four hundred paces above old Fort Crawford, on the east
side of the Mississippi, and killed twenty-five of the latter, and
wounded many who may probably recover. There were about thirty or
forty Menominees, men, women and children, in the camp, most of whom
were drunk, and the women had hidden their guns and knives, to prevent
their hurting each other. The Sacs and Foxes, though so greatly
superior in numbers, and attacking by surprise a drunken and unarmed
encampment, lost several men who were seen to fall in the onset, and
retreated in less than ten minutes, with only a few scalps, pursued by
four or five Menominees, who fired on them until they were half a mile
below the village. I received information, and was on the ground in an
hour and a half after the murders were committed. The butchery was
horrid, and the view can only be imagined by those acquainted with
savage warfare.
“At seven o’clock a.m., I addressed the letter marked ‘A’ to the
officer commanding at Fort Crawford, giving him the first intimation
of the massacre, and received in answer his letter of this date,
marked ‘B’. Lieut. Lamotte, stationed on the west bank of the
Mississippi, two miles below Prairie du Chien, saw the Indians pass up
about 9 o’clock p.m. the night the murders were committed and again
saw them descend with great rapidity at daylight the next morning.
An express was dispatched by the commanding officer here to Rock
Island at two o’clock on the day of the murders; but no other steps to
arrest these daring violators of the provisions of the treaty of July,
1830, have, as I believe, been taken.
“To-day, the remaining Menominees asked to speak to me, and I met them
accordingly. They complain of the violation of the treaty, and say
they have fallen victims to their confidence in the security that was
promised them under the sanctions of a treaty made in the presence of
their fathers, Gen. Clark and Col. Morgan. That Col. Morgan promised
them a free and secure path to this place, and that if they were
struck, he would march an army of his warriors into the country of
those who struck them with their warriors, and take man for man of
their enemies. They say they have lost many of their bravest men. ‘One
of our chiefs has lost all his family; his wife and his children and
his brother were all murdered, and he is left alone. He is not here;
he is in his lodge mourning.’ They added, ‘Take pity on our women and
our orphan children, and give us something to console us, and we will
wait a while to see if our great father, whom you tell us is strong,
will help us to punish those Sacs and Foxes, who shake hands and smoke
the pipe of peace to-day, and to-morrow break it and kill those they
smoked with.’ Under existing circumstances, I deemed it prudent and
humane to give them a few things and to provide some necessaries for
their destitute children, the amount of which I will forward by mail.
I also promised to lay the affair before their great father, the
President, and ask him to have justice done for them agreeably to
their treaty, if they would go into their country and remain quiet.
They have promised to do so a short time, yet I learn from other
sources that runners have been dispatched to Green Bay and among the
Sioux.
“The Menominees also complain that they were promised that if they
would be quiet, their great father would see justice done between them
and the Chippeways. That nothing is done, nor are their dead covered.
They remarked, ‘Shall we remain quiet on the faith of our great father
until we are all killed? When will our great father answer us?’
“They inform me that a white man (a discharged soldier from St.
Peters) had killed a Menominee a few days past. On inquiry I learned
that the white man had a fight with two Indians, and in the fight he
struck the Indian on the head with a stick and fractured his skull,
and he died the day after. There is no white person who can testify
anything about it, and the white man has gone off, I know not where.
“I have received no answer to my letters respecting the murder of the
Menominees by the Chippeways, and am unable to satisfy them on that
subject. I now hope that on the present representation of facts, the
Government will feel the necessity of a prompt interference, to save
this fort from a general rupture.
“The pacification of July, 1830, has been violated under the guns of
Fort Crawford, and if some immediate course is not taken to chastise
those violators of that solemn arrangement, the influence of the
officers of the United States will be destroyed and the power of the
Government disregarded by the Indians.
“Respectfully, etc., etc.,
“JOS. M. STREET, Indian Agent.
“GEN. WILLIAM CLARK, Superintendent of Indian Affairs at St. Louis.”
“U.S. Indian Agency at Prairie du Chien,
July 31, 1831, 7 o’clock A.M.
“Sir:–After a personal inspection of the scene of massacre, I hasten
to inform you that last night the Sacs and Foxes struck the
Menominees, encamped on the east side of the Mississippi, about three
or four hundred paces above old Fort Crawford, and killed
twenty-four[88] of the latter, butchering them in a most shocking
manner.
“The Sacs and Foxes came up and left their canoes just above the old
fort and completely surprised the Menominees, who, under the sanction
of the peace of 1830 at this place, and their vicinity to the fort,
were unsuspicious of danger.
“The attack was made about two hours before daylight, and the
assailants were gone before light.
“So daring a violation of the treaty of July, 1830, made at this
village, and within cannon shot of the fort, evinces a spirit little
in accordance with its humane and pacific object.
“I am also this moment informed that runners will be immediately
dispatched by the Menominees to Green Bay and to the Sioux.
“I shall be at Judge Lockwood’s during the day.
“Respectfully yours, etc.,
“JOSEPH M. STREET, U.S. Indian Agent.
“To CAPT. G. LOOMIS; Commanding Fort Crawford.”
“Superintendency of Indian Affairs,
“St. Louis, Sept. 12, 1831.
“Sir:–I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of
the 26th ult. on the subject of the late violation of the treaty of
Prairie du Chien by the Fox Indians; and have, in accordance with your
instructions, given the necessary directions to the agent at Rock
Island to convene the chiefs of the Fox tribes, etc., at that place,
to meet, if possible, on the 26th inst. Col. Morgan will, agreeably to
the directions of Gen. Atkinson, be present at the council and will
make the necessary demand of a surrender of the principal men
connected with the outrage complained of; and I have reason to believe
that if the requirements of the act of intercourse of 1802, as well as
the stipulations of the treaty of 1825, shall be strictly complied
with, it will be owing to the prompt and decisive measures pursued by
the department. The result of this council shall be promptly
communicated.
“I take the liberty of enclosing to you herewith two letters from
Major Taliaferro, of the 8th and 12th August, and one from Gen.
Street, received by the last mail, charging the Sacs with another
violation of the treaty of 1825. The facts, however, in relation to
this last affair have been differently stated by the Sacs, who were
the first (it appears) to commence them. They say that the affair took
place on their own land, on the waters of the Ioway River; that a
party of the Sioux, in a buffalo chase, fired upon some of their
people and killed a Sac, and that the rest of their people coming up,
pursued the Sioux, and killed two of them.[89] I have the honor to be,
with high respect, Your most obedient servant,
“WM. CLARK.
“The HON. LEWIS CASS, Secretary of War.”
“Rock Island Indian Agency,
“September 10, 1831. \
“Respected Sir:–I have been informed, and it is currently reported,
that two Sioux and three Sac Indians met in a prairie, within the
limits of the Sac and Fox lands; that one of the Sacs went up towards
the Sioux with the intention of shaking hands with them; but the Sioux
refused and threw off their blankets and breech cloths, evidently
showing an unfriendly disposition towards the Sacs; the Sac still
continued approaching them until they shot him dead. The other two
Sacs, who had been concealed from the view of the Sioux, pursued them
until they killed both the Sioux. This is the report of the Sac
Indians.[90]
“I, in concert with Major Bliss, called a council of the principal
chiefs of the Sac and Fox Indians for the purpose of demanding the
leaders of the band which were concerned in the massacre at Prairie du
Chien. The result is as contained in the enclosed journal, which was
kept for the purpose. The Indians remained at this place about four
days; they got credit from their traders and departed with the
intention of making an immediate move to their hunting grounds. I
presume that you have heard of the death of Morgan, the Fox brave. One
of his followers, after hearing of the circumstance, said that it was
useless for him to live any longer, now that Morgan was no more. He
took his rifle and went out and shot himself.
“Since writing the above, Captain Low told me that the Menominees were
preparing to march against the Sacs and Foxes, and that they would
listen to no one, but were determined to take revenge. Should I get
any further information on the subject, I will immediately inform you
of it. I have the honor to be
Your obedient servant,
“FELIX ST. VRAIN, Indian Agent. \
“GENERAL WILLIAM CLARK,
“Superintendent Indian Affairs, St. Louis.”
“JOURNAL OF A COUNCIL HELD WITH THE CHIEFS AND WARRIORS OF THE SAC AND
FOX INDIANS AT FORT ARMSTRONG ON THE FIFTH SEPTEMBER, 1831, BY MAJOR
BLISS, FIRST INFANTRY, COMMANDING, AND FELIX ST. VRAIN, THE U.S.
AGENT.
“At about 12 o’clock the council was opened by the commanding officer,
as follows:
“‘Chiefs and Warriors of the Sacs and Foxes: By the treaty of Prairie
du Chien, made at the request of the President of the United States
with the Sioux, Menominees and other Indian tribes, you solemnly
promised and agreed that there should be peace between you and those
tribes. You also agreed that if either tribe should attack either of
the other tribes, that the persons of those who should be concerned in
the outrage should be delivered up to the officers of the United
States. About four or five nights since a war party of Foxes and some
Sacs, led on by Pash-qua-mee, attacked a peaceable party of Menominees
near Fort Crawford and killed 26 men, women and children. Wrong has
been done and the treaty of Prairie du Chien has been violated.
“‘It becomes our duty, therefore, as officers of the United States, to
demand that you, the chiefs and warriors of the Sac and Fox Indians,
deliver and surrender to us Pash-qua-mee and all the principal Indians
of the Sacs and Foxes who were engaged in this late massacre of the
Menominees near Fort Crawford, and we do demand them. We wait for your
answer. We hope it may be such as to convince the President, the Great
Council and the citizens of the United States that the Sacs and Foxes
are not liars; that they always speak truth and perform as they
promise.’
“After a short delay, Tiornay (the Strawberry), a Fox chief, replied:
‘My Father: I have heard you and the commanding officer. We were all
at the treaty at Prairie du Chien. We have the talk in our minds. All
the chiefs you see here have told the young men left behind all that
was said at that time. It is because you do not know our manners that
you think ill of this. When we hear of a war party going out, we do
all in our power to stop it. You have heard what I say. We did not
tell them to go to war.
“‘My Father and Commanding Officer: How can we stop our men, when your
white men cannot stop the whites from committing crimes? Both of our
cases are hard; our young men will not do what we wish, and yours act
in the same way. This is all I have to say.’
“Kottekennekak, the Bald Eagle, a Fox brave, then said: ‘My Father:
Though we were all at Prairie du Chien, how can we stop our young men?
They go off while we are asleep and we know nothing of it. It was not
by our consent that the young men struck the Menominees at Prairie du
Chien. We have done all we could; but the young men will not listen to
us.’
“Quash-quah-ing, the Jumping Fish, a British chief: ‘My Father and my
Friends: All the chiefs are dead and the young men have told me to
speak for them. You tell the truth about the treaty at Prairie du
Chien, but the Menominees struck us first and we struck back. The
chiefs have said, “Do not let us strike first.” What do you expect us
to do? We only do what our old chiefs have told us. The chiefs that
have spoken told the truth; but what can we do when our young men will
not listen?’
“Keokuk, he that has been everywhere, a Sac brave:
“‘You tell the truth about the treaty at Prairie du Chien. I was there
myself; but you tell a little more. After the treaty was concluded at
Prairie du Chien, I and four chiefs went to General Clark and Colonel
Morgan and said to them, “What will you do with those that strike
first?” They told us that the principal men should be delivered. This
is what I mean when I say “a little more.” It was then discovered and
explained that the word “principal” had not been interpreted.
“‘My old man (pointing to Quash-quah-ing) did not understand. After
the affair of last year we went to General Clark and Colonel Morgan
and, notwithstanding the attack of the Menominees, they made all good
and even. But now, if what they did and what we have now done was put
in scales, it would balance. I expect it is because our names are Sacs
and Foxes that you make a noise about it. When we do the least thing,
you make a great noise about it. Last winter I went to the Missouri.
There an Ioway killed an Omaha. Why was he not hung? They were at the
treaty. The reason I say so much against you is because our hearts are
good. Our chiefs were killed with the pipe of peace and the wampum in
their hands. This is all I have to say. As for my chiefs and braves,
they will do as they please. I have said all that I have to say; but
why do you not let us fight? Your whites are constantly fighting. They
are now fighting way east. Why do you not interfere with them? Why do
you not let us be as the Great Spirit made us, and let us settle our
difficulties?’”
As this speech of Keokuk’s was received by the Indians with applause for
its ingenuity, the commanding officer thought it proper to add that such
treaties as were made at Prairie du Chien were frequently made between
the white nations at the east and enforced.
That it was not because they were Sacs that the present demand was made,
but because it was not wished that the Sacs would become liars. That as
it regarded the Omahas, whenever they demanded redress for the murder
from the United States, it would then be time to interfere. That the
affair did not concern the Sacs.
James H. Lockwood, Vol. 2, p. 170, and John H. Fonda, Vol. 5, p. 256, in
writing of these events from memory for the Wisconsin Historical
Collections, fixed upon the year 1830 for the murders of the Sioux and
Kettle’s Foxes, Fonda including the Menominee affair in the same year.
A.R. Fulton, in his “Red Men of Iowa,” inferentially used the same year
for the three events; all agreed that the three followed in _rapid_
succession. Lockwood has made so many glaring errors in other parts of
his narrative that it is easy to believe that he was wrong in placing
any of them in 1830. The three affairs did occur with unusual
propinquity of succession, but in 1831, as the contemporaneous reports
herein given have shown, and which must be believed against memory. L.C.
Draper, usually accurate, fell into Lockwood’s mistake in his note to
Fonda’s letter, by not taking time to investigate.
-----
Footnote 84:
Peters’ U.S. Stat. at Large, Vol. vii. p. 272.
Footnote 85:
See same in map of “Military Tract.”
Footnote 86:
Vol. 2, Wis. Hist. Colls., p. 170.
Footnote 87:
Keokuk, as will be seen later, said the matter was “made all good and
even,” but no record of the transaction is to be found.
Footnote 88:
Twenty-five.
Footnote 89:
Untrue in every respect. Every Sac who attempted an explanation had a
widely different version.
Footnote 90:
Substantially different from the other version and painfully unreal.
-----
------------------------------------------------------------------------