CHAPTER CXXIX.
THE ADVERTISING AGENT.
On the day after the one the incidents of which have just been related,
Mr. Bubbleton Styles called, precisely as the clock struck eleven in
the forenoon, upon an advertising agent dwelling in the immediate
vicinity of Cornhill.
The agent, knowing that Mr. Styles was the registered promoter of a
scheme which had obtained the patronage of the high and mighty Mr.
Podgson, was particularly civil and urbane; and having bowed him into
the private office, and presented him with a chair, he said, “Now, Mr.
Styles, sir--what can I do for you?”
“I intend to give the newspapers a round of advertisements,” answered
the City gentleman, pulling out his prospectuses.
“Softly--softly, my dear sir,” exclaimed the agent: “you must be guided
by me in this. If you went to the generality of agents, they would
say, ‘_Oh! advertise by all means in every paper in existence_:’--but I,
Mr. Styles, am a little more conscientious. There are some journals,
in fact, which are perfectly useless as advertising media: it would be
money completely thrown away.”
“I am much obliged to you for your kindness,” said Mr. Styles. “Of
course we shall advertise in the _Times_.”
“As a matter of course!” cried the agent. “’Tis the great daily
Leviathan which every body sees, no matter what his politics may be.
The _Morning Chronicle_, too, is a good medium: the _Herald_, _Post_,
and _Advertiser_ must likewise be included;--and it would be folly to
omit the _Sun_, _Globe_, and _Standard_.”
“Well--and what about the _Daily News_ and the _Express_?” asked Mr.
Styles, apparently astonished that no reference should have been made
to those print.
“The _Daily News_!” ejaculated the agent, in perfect wonderment: “the
_Express_!” he cried, in horrified amazement. “Excuse me, my dear
friend--but are you mad? have you taken leave of your senses?”
“I hope not,” responded Mr. Styles, in his usual calm, business-like
manner. “What makes you think so?”
“What makes me think so!” repeated the agent: “why, the idea that
you should for an instant entertain the notion of advertising in
those contemptible abortions! They are a perfect disgrace to
newspaper literature, sir,” proceeded the agent, who was speaking
conscientiously, and indeed truly. “Did you ever happen to read the
_Daily News_?”
“I have never seen the paper in my life,” answered Mr. Styles: “I had
only heard of it.”
“And you are not likely to see it,” returned the agent, “unless you go
into the heart of Wapping or explore the back slums of Whitechapel. No
respectable newsman keeps it: not that newsmen are more particular than
other shop-keepers--but they only keep what they can sell, Mr. Styles.
As for the _Express_, it is a regular cheat of an evening paper--made
up entirely of the articles in the _Daily News_, without even having
the bad grammar and the typographical errors corrected. But both prints
are the most contemptible threepenny things I ever saw in my life; and
one would be inclined to fancy that all the real newspaper talent had
been absorbed by the pre-existing journals, leaving only the meanest
literary scrubs in London to _do_ the _News_ and the _Express_.”
“And yet I thought that the _News_ had been started under the auspices
of Mr. Charles Dickens--the immortal _Boz_?” said Mr. Styles,
interrogatively.
“So it was,” replied the advertising agent: “but the name of Charles
Dickens was rather damnatory than useful to a newspaper-speculation.
Every one must admit that _Boz_ is a great novelist--a very great
novelist indeed--the Fielding of his age; but he is totally incapable
of writing for a newspaper. The proprietors of the _News_ made a
tremendous splash with his name; but they only created a quagmire for
themselves to flounder in. When their paper was first coming out, every
body thought it was to do wonders. The _Times_ was to lose half its
subscribers; and the _Chronicle_ was to be ruined altogether. But,
alas! never did so labouring a mountain produce such a contemptible
mouse; and people began to fancy that the wags engaged on _Punch_ had
started the _Daily News_ as a grand parody on the newspaper press. The
leaders were rubbish--the criticisms of new works, mere nonsense--the
dramatic reviews, utter balderdash. It however seems that in the lowest
depths there is a deeper still even with the bathos of journalists;
for when the _News_ tumbled down (which it soon did) to a two-penny
halfpenny print, the rubbish, the nonsense, and the balderdash became
more astounding still. There is a young man named Bilk who does the
‘_moral department_’ of the paper; and he is the most grovelling
ass that ever was created. He undertakes to review a whole batch
of cheap publications in a lump; but what he calls _reviewing_ is
nothing else than _abusing_ the works with an insolence so cool, and
a rashness so indiscriminate that he must be as consummate a coxcomb
as he is an unprincipled ruffian. The _News_ affects a moral tone, and
entrusts its conscience to this half-buffoon--half-barbarian, in the
hope that the lucubrations of the ungrammatical scribe may acquire
for it the reputation of a serious, sober, and sedate journal. The
despicable being to whom I allude is the son of the proprietor of the
_Assinœum_--a paper which Bulwer mauled and exposed so terribly in one
of his admirable novels many years ago. The articles in the _Assinœum_
may be termed TWADDLE UPON STILTS----”
“You are really very inveterate in your denunciations of these prints,”
observed Mr. Styles, who having an hour to spare, did not experience
any impatience in listening to the agent’s remarks.
“Not at all inveterate--only justly indignant,” was the answer. “I am
indignant, because I admire the newspaper press of Great Britain--I
am proud of it--I glory in belonging to the country which possesses
it; and therefore when I see journalism prostituted to the lowest
and meanest purposes--when I behold such despicable abortions as the
_Daily News_ and the _Express_ daring to show themselves in that
sphere where respectability and talent alone existed until those
threepenny things made their appearance,--I am angry--I am disgusted!
Only see how the _News_ has been tinkered and hacked about with the
idea of making it a property. First it was five-pence--then it was
two-pence halfpenny--next it was three-pence;--and yet with all this
derogatory experimentalising, the owners have failed to make it a
property. What a miserable thing does it look, with its beggarly
three columns of advertisements! The _Times_ has as many in a day as
the _News_ has had altogether since its sickly existence began. The
very Parliamentary Reporters engaged upon the _News_ are ashamed of
their connexion with such a scurvy affair; and the doorkeeper of the
Gallery of the House of Commons looks on them with kind commiseration,
knowing how degrading it must be to their feelings to take their places
in the seats allotted to the representatives of that three-penny
hodgepodge. You never see the _News_ quoted from nor alluded to by
its contemporaries. It is not recognised as a member of the newspaper
press. It has tried all imaginable kinds of manœuvres to force itself
into notoriety,--sometimes currying favour with the superior journals,
and at others abusing them; but all to no purpose. Its contemporaries
will _not_ notice it: they will not be bullied nor coaxed into such
condescension. Why--would you believe that the very Editor is heartily
ashamed of his post: but he knows that if he resigned it, he should be
compelled to relapse into the lowest walks of penny-a-lining, whence he
was dragged forth to conduct the _thing_.”
“How is it possible that such a contemptible journal continues in
existence?” asked Mr. Styles.
“There! now you puzzle me indeed!” exclaimed the advertising agent.
“The question you have put to me involves one of the greatest mysteries
of London; and I am quite incapable of affording you the solution. Time
will however show: for, in this case, time _must_ clear up all doubt
and uncertainty regarding the matter. For the present, however, take my
advice and refrain from advertising in a paper which is contemptible in
circulation and influence--scurrilous[8] or hypocritical, according to
circumstances, in its literary articles--and wishy-washy in the extreme
in its leaders.”
“Well, I am excessively obliged to you for this most useful warning,”
observed Mr. Bubbleton Styles. “You have nothing to say against the
_Weekly Dispatch_--the _Sunday Times_--_Bell’s Life in London_----”
“All good papers!” exclaimed the advertising agent. “But here is a
list of those metropolitan and provincial journals in which I should
recommend you to advertise.”
“I place myself entirely in your hands,” answered the promoter of the
grandest railway scheme ever devised: and, thrusting his hands into
his breeches pockets, he rattled a little silver and a great many
halfpence, saying, “Shall I give you a hundred or so in advance? or
will you send in the account----”
“Pray do not think of offering any sum in advance, Mr. Styles--my
dear Mr. Styles!” cried the agent. “It is but a trifle: three
hundred guineas will cover the outlay for this first batch of
advertisements--and I will send in my little account to the secretary
when the Board meets.”
“Very good,” rejoined the promoter;--and, having come to this excellent
understanding, the two gentlemen parted--Mr. Styles betaking himself to
Garraway’s Coffee-house, where he ate his lunch standing at the bar,
and afterwards returning to his office at Crosby Hall Chambers.