CHAPTER LII.

CONCERNING THE CUSTOMS OF THE TARTARS.

Now that we have begun to speak of the Tartars, I have plenty to tell

you on that subject. The Tartar custom is to spend the winter in warm

plains, where they find good pasture for their cattle, whilst in summer

they betake themselves to a cool climate among the mountains and

valleys, where water is to be found as well as woods and pastures.

Their houses are circular, and are made of wands covered with felts.{1}

These are carried along with them whithersoever they go; for the wands

are so strongly bound together, and likewise so well combined, that

the frame can be made very light. Whenever they erect these huts the

door is always to the south. They also have waggons covered with black

felt so efficaciously that no rain can get in. These are drawn by oxen

and camels, and the women and children travel in them.{2} The women

do the buying and selling, and whatever is necessary to provide for

the husband and household; for the men all lead the life of gentlemen,

troubling themselves about nothing but hunting and hawking, and looking

after their goshawks and falcons, unless it be the practice of warlike

exercises.

They live on the milk and meat which their herds supply, and on the

produce of the chase; and they eat all kinds of flesh, including that

of horses and dogs, and Pharaoh’s rats, of which last there are great

numbers in burrows on those plains.{3} Their drink is mare’s milk.

They are very careful not to meddle with each other’s wives, and will

not do so on any account, holding that to be an evil and abominable

thing. The women too are very good and loyal to their husbands, and

notable housewives withal.{4} [Ten or twenty of them will dwell

together in charming peace and unity, nor shall you ever hear an ill

word among them.]

The marriage customs of Tartars are as follows. Any man may take a

hundred wives an he so please, and if he be able to keep them. But the

first wife is ever held most in honour, and as the most legitimate [and

the same applies to the sons whom she may bear]. The husband gives a

marriage payment to his wife’s mother, and the wife brings nothing to

her husband. They have more children than other people, because they

have so many wives. They may marry their cousins, and if a father dies,

his son may take any of the wives, his own mother always excepted; that

is to say the eldest son may do this, but no other. A man may also take

the wife of his own brother after the latter’s death. Their weddings

are celebrated with great ado.{5}

NOTE 1.—The word here in the G. T. is “_fennes_,” which seems

usually to mean _ropes_, and in fact Pauthier’s text reads: “_Il

ont mesons de verges et les cueuvrent de cordes_.” Ramusio’s text

has _feltroni_, and both Müller and the Latin of the S. G. have

_filtro_. This is certainly the right reading. But whether _fennes_

was ever used as a form of _feltres_ (as _pennes_ means _peltry_)

I cannot discover. Perhaps some words have dropped out. A good

description of a Kirghiz hut (35 feet in diameter), and exactly

corresponding to Polo’s account, will be found in _Atkinson’s

Siberia_, and another in _Vámbéry’s Travels_. How comfortable

and civilised the aspect of such a hut may be, can be seen also

in Burnes’s account of a Turkoman dwelling of this kind. This

description of hut or tent is common to nearly all the nomade

tribes of Central Asia. The trellis-work forming the skeleton of

the tent-walls is (at least among the Turkomans) loosely pivoted,

so as to draw out and compress like “lazy-tongs.”

[Illustration: Dressing up a tent.]

Rubruquis, Pallas, Timkowski, and others, notice the custom of

turning the door to the south; the reason is obvious. (_Atkinson_,

285; _Vámb._ 316; _Burnes_, III. 51; _Conolly_, I. 96) But

throughout the Altai, Mr. Ney Elias informs me, K’alkas, Kirghiz,

and Kalmaks all pitch their tents facing _east_. The prevailing

winter wind is there _westerly_.

[Mr. Rockhill (_Rubruck_, p. 56, note) says that he has often

seen Mongol tents facing east and south-east. He adds: “It is

interesting to find it noted in the _Chou Shu_ (Bk. 50, 3) that the

Khan of the Turks, who lived always on the Tu-kin mountains, had

his tent invariably facing south, so as to show reverence to the

sun’s rising place.”—H. C.]

NOTE 2.—Æschylus already knows the

“wandering Scyths who dwell

In latticed huts high-poised on easy wheels.”

(_Prom. Vinct._ 709–710.)

And long before him Hesiod says Phineus was carried by the Harpies—

“To the Land of the Milk-fed nations, whose houses are waggons.”

(_Strabo_, vii. 3–9.)

Ibn Batuta describes the Tartar waggon in which he travelled to

Sarai as mounted on four great wheels, and drawn by two or more

horses:—

“On the waggon is put a sort of pavilion of wands laced together

with narrow thongs. It is very light, and is covered with felt or

cloth, and has latticed windows, so that the person inside can look

out without being seen. He can change his position at pleasure,

sleeping or eating, reading or writing, during the journey.” These

waggons were sometimes of enormous size. Rubruquis declares that

he measured between the wheel-tracks of one and found the interval

to be 20 feet. The axle was like a ship’s mast, and twenty-two

oxen were yoked to the waggon, eleven abreast. (See opposite cut.)

He describes the huts as not usually taken to pieces, but carried

all standing. The waggon just mentioned carried a hut of 30 feet

diameter, for it projected beyond the wheels at least 5 feet on

either side. In fact, Carpini says explicitly, “Some of the huts

are speedily taken to pieces and put up again; such are packed

on the beasts. Others cannot be taken to pieces, but are carried

bodily on the waggons. To carry the smaller tents on a waggon one

ox may serve; for the larger ones three oxen or four, or even more,

according to the size.” The carts that were used to transport the

Tartar valuables were covered with felt soaked in tallow or ewe’s

milk, to make them waterproof. The tilts of these were rectangular,

in the form of a large trunk. The carts used in Kashgar, as

described by Mr. Shaw, seem to resemble these latter. (_I. B._ II.

381–382; _Rub._ 221; _Carp._ 6, 16.)

The words of Herodotus, speaking generally of the Scyths, apply

perfectly to the Mongol hordes under Chinghiz: “Having neither

cities nor forts, and carrying their dwellings with them wherever

they go; accustomed, moreover, one and all, to shoot from

horseback; and living not by husbandry but on their cattle, their

waggons the only houses that they possess, how can they fail of

being unconquerable?” (Bk. IV. ch. 46, p. 41, _Rawlins._) Scythian

prisoners in their waggons are represented on the Column of

Theodosius at Constantinople; but it is difficult to believe that

these waggons, at least as figured in Banduri, have any really

Scythian character.

It is a curious fact that the practice of carrying these _yurts_

or felt tents upon waggons appears to be entirely obsolete in

Mongolia. Mr. Ney Elias writes: “I frequently showed your picture

[that opposite] to Mongols, Chinese, and Russian border-traders,

but none had ever seen anything of the kind. The only cart I have

ever seen used by Mongols is a little low, light, roughly-made

bullock-dray, _certainly_ of Chinese importation.” The old system

would, however, appear to have been kept up to our own times by

the Nogai Tartars, near the Sea of Azof. (See note from Heber, in

_Clark’s Travels_, 8vo ed. I. 440, and Dr. Clark’s vignette at p.

394 in the same volume.)

[Illustration: J. Cooper Sc

Mediæval Tartar Huts and Waggons.]

NOTE 3.—_Pharaoh’s Rat_ was properly the Gerboa of Arabia and

North Africa, which the Arabs also regard as a dainty. There

is a kindred animal in Siberia, called _Alactaga_, and a kind of

Kangaroo-rat (probably the same) is mentioned as very abundant

on the Mongolian Steppe. There is also the _Zieselmaus_ of

Pallas, a Dormouse, I believe, which he says the Kalmaks, even of

distinction, count a delicacy, especially cooked in sour milk.

“They eat not only the flesh of all their different kinds of

cattle, including horses and camels, but also that of many wild

animals which other nations eschew, _e.g._ marmots and _zieselmice_,

beavers, badgers, otters, and lynxes, leaving none untouched except

the dog and weasel kind, and also (unless _very_ hard pressed) the

flesh of the fox and the wolf.” (_Pallas, Samml._ I. 128; also

_Rubr._ 229–230.)

[“In the Mongol biography of Chinghiz Khan (Mongol text of the

_Yuan ch’ao pi shi_), mention is made of two kinds of animals

(mice) used for food; the tarbagat (_Aritomys Bobac_) and

_kuchugur_.” (_Palladius_, _l.c._ p. 14.) Regarding the marmots

called _Sogur_ by Rubruquis, Mr. Rockhill writes (p. 69): “Probably

the _Mus citillus_, the _Suslik_ of the Russians.... M. Grenard

tells me that _Soghur_, more usually written _sour_ in Turki, is

the ordinary name of the marmot.”—H. C.]

NOTE 4.—“Their wives are chaste; nor does one ever hear any talk

of their immodesty,” says Carpini;—no Boccaccian and Chaucerian

stories.

NOTE 5.—“The Mongols are not prohibited from having a plurality of

wives; the first manages the domestic concerns, and is the most

respected.” (_Timk._ II. 310.) Naturally Polygamy is not so general

among the Mongols as when Asia lay at their feet. The Buraets, who

seem to retain the old Mongol customs in great completeness, are

polygamists, and have as many wives as they choose. Polygamy is

also very prevalent among the Yakuts, whose lineage seems to be

Eastern Turk. (_Ritter_, III. 125; _Erman_, II. 346.)

Of the custom that entitled the son on succeeding to take such

as he pleased of his deceased father’s wives, we have had some

illustration (see _Prologue_, ch. xvii. note 2), and many

instances will be found in Hammer’s or other Mongol Histories.

The same custom seems to be ascribed by Herodotus to the Scyths

(IV. 78). A number of citations regarding the practice are given

by Quatremère. (_Q. R._ p. 92.) A modern Mongol writer in the

_Mélanges Asiatiques_ of the Petersburg Academy, states that the

custom of taking a deceased brother’s wives is now obsolete, but

that a proverb preserves its memory (II. 656). It is the custom of

some Mahomedan nations, notably of the Afghans, and is one of those

points that have been cited as a supposed proof of their Hebrew

lineage.

“The Kalin is a present which the Bridegroom or his parents make

to the parents of the Bride. All the Pagan nations of Siberia have

this custom; they differ only in what constitutes the present,

whether money or cattle.” (_Gmelin_, I. 29; see also _Erman_, II.

348.)