CHAPTER LVIII.

OF THE KINGDOM OF EGRIGAIA.

Starting again from Erguiul you ride eastward for eight days, and

then come to a province called EGRIGAIA, containing numerous cities

and villages, and belonging to Tangut.{1} The capital city is called

CALACHAN.{2} The people are chiefly Idolaters, but there are fine

churches belonging to the Nestorian Christians. They are all subjects

of the Great Kaan. They make in this city great quantities of camlets

of camel’s wool, the finest in the world; and some of the camlets that

they make are white, for they have white camels, and these are the best

of all. Merchants purchase these stuffs here, and carry them over the

world for sale.{3}

We shall now proceed eastward from this place and enter the territory

that was formerly Prester John’s.

NOTE 1.—Chinghiz invaded Tangut in all five times, viz. in 1205,

1207, 1209 (or according to Erdmann, 1210–1211), 1218, and

1226–1227, on which last expedition he died.

_A_. In the third invasion, according to D’Ohsson’s Chinese guide

(Father Hyacinth), he took the town of _Uiraca_, and the fortress

of Imen, and laid siege to the capital, then called Chung-sing or

Chung-hing, now Ning-hsia.

Rashid, in a short notice of this campaign, calls the first city

_Erica_, _Erlaca_, or, as Erdmann has it, _Artacki_. In De Mailla

it is _Ulahai_.

_B_. On the last invasion (1226), D’Ohsson’s Chinese authority says

that Chinghiz took Kanchau and Suhchau, Cholo and Khola in the

province of Liangcheu, and then proceeded to the Yellow River, and

invested Lingchau, south of Ning-hsia.

Erdmann, following his reading of Rashiduddin, says Chinghiz

took the cities of Tangut, called _Arucki_, _Kachu_, _Sichu_,

and _Kamichu_, and besieged Deresgai (D’Ohsson, _Derssekai_),

whilst Shidergu, the King of Tangut, betook himself to his capital

_Artackin_.

D’Ohsson, also professing to follow Rashid, calls this “his capital

_Irghai_, which the Mongols call _Ircaya_.” Klaproth, illustrating

Polo, reads “Eyircai, which the Mongols call _Eyircayá_.”

Pétis de la Croix, relating the same campaign and professing to

follow Fadlallah, _i.e._ Rashiduddin, says the king “retired to his

fortress of _Arbaca_.”

_C_. Sanang Setzen several times mentions a city called _Irghai_,

_apparently_ in Tangut; but all we can gather as to his position is

that it seems to have lain east of Kanchau.

We perceive that the _Arbaca_ of P. de la Croix, the _Eyircai_ of

Klaproth, the _Uiraca_ of D’Ohsson, the _Artacki_ or _Artackin_ of

Erdmann, are all various readings or forms of the same name, and

are the same with the Chinese form _Ulahai_ of De Mailla, and most

probably the place is the _Egrigaia_ of Polo.

We see also that Erdmann mentions another place _Aruki_ (ارقى?)

in connection with Kanchau and Suhchau. This is, I suspect, the

_Erguiul_ of Polo, and perhaps the Irghai of Sanang Setzen.

Rashiduddin seems wrong in calling Ircayá the capital of the king,

a circumstance which leads Klaproth to identify it with Ning-hsia.

Pauthier, identifying Ulahai with Egrigaya, shows that the former

was one of the circles of Tangut, but _not_ that of Ning-hsia. Its

position, he says, is uncertain. Klaproth, however, inserts it in

his map of Asia, in the era of Kúblái (_Tabl. Hist._ pl. 22), as

_Ulakhai_ to the north of Ning-hsia, near the great bend eastward

of the Hwang-Ho. Though it may have extended in this direction, it

is probable, from the name referred to in next note, that Egrigaia

or Ulahai is represented by the modern principality of ALASHAN,

visited by Prjevalsky in 1871 and 1872.

[New travels and researches enable me to say that there can be

no doubt that _Egrigaia = Ning-hsia_. Palladius (_l.c._ 18) says:

“_Egrigaia_ is Erigaia of the Mongol text. Klaproth was correct

in his supposition that it is modern Ning-h’ia. Even now the

Eleuths of Alashan call Ning-h’ia, _Yargai_. In M. Polo’s time

this department was famous for the cultivation of the Safflower

(_carthamus tinctorius_). [_Siu t’ung kien_, A.D. 1292.]” Mr.

Rockhill (cf. his _Diary of a Journey_) writes to me that Ning-hsia

is still called _Irge Khotun_ by Mongols at the present day. M.

Bonin (_J. As._, 1900. I. 585) mentions the same fact.

Palladius (19) adds: “_Erigaia_ is not to be confounded with

_Urahai_, often mentioned in the history of Chingis Khan’s wars

with the Tangut kingdom. Urahai was a fortress in a pass of the

same name in the Alashan Mountains. Chingis Khan spent five months

there (an. 1208), during which he invaded and plundered the country

in the neighbourhood. [_Si hia shu shi._] The Alashan Mountains

form a semicircle 500 _li_ in extent, and have over forty narrow

passes leading to the department of Ning-hia; the broadest and most

practicable of these is now called Ch’i-mu-K’ow; it is not more

than 80 feet broad. [_Ning hia fu chi._] It may be that the Urahai

fortress existed near this pass.”

“From Liang-chow fu, M. Polo follows a special route, leaving the

modern postal route on his right; the road he took has, since the

time of the Emperor K’ang-hi, been called the courier’s route.”

(_Palladius_, 18.)—H. C.]

NOTE 2.—_Calachan_, the chief town of Egrigaia, is mentioned,

according to Klaproth, by Rashiduddin, among the cities of Tangut,

as KALAJÁN. The name and approximate position suggest, as just

noticed, identity with Alashan, the modern capital of which, called

by Prjevalsky Dyn-yuan-yin, stands some distance west of the

Hwang-Ho, in about lat. 39°. Polo gives no data for the interval

between this and his next stage.

[The _Dyn-yuan-yin_ of Prjevalsky is the camp of _Ting-yuan-yng_

or Fu-ma-fu of M. Bonin, the residence of the Si-wang (western

prince), of Alashan, an abbreviation of Alade-shan (_shan_,

mountain in Chinese), Alade = Eleuth or Œlöt; the sister of this

prince married a son of Prince Tuan, the chief of the _Boxers_.

(_La Géographie_, 1901. I. 118.) Palladius (_l.c._ 19) says: “Under

the name of Calachan, Polo probably means the summer residence of

the Tangut kings, which was 60 _li_ from Ning-hia, at the foot

of the Alashan Mountains. It was built by the famous Tangut king

Yuen-hao, on a large scale, in the shape of a castle, in which

were high terraces and magnificent buildings. Traces of these

buildings are visible to this day. There are often found coloured

tiles and iron nails 1 foot, and even 2 feet long. The last Tangut

kings made this place their permanent residence, and led there

an indolent and sensual life. The Chinese name of this residence

was Ho-lan shan _Li-Kung_. There is sufficient reason to suppose

that this very residence is named (under the year 1226) in the

Mongol text _Alashai nuntuh_; and in the chronicles of the Tangut

Kingdom, _Halahachar_, otherwise _Halachar_, apparently in the

Tangut language. Thus M. Polo’s Calachan can be identified with the

Halachar of the _Si hia shu shi_, and can be taken to designate the

Alashan residence of the Tangut kings.”—H. C.]

NOTE 3.—Among the Buraets and Chinese at Kiakhta snow-white camels,

without albino character, are often seen, and probably in other

parts of Mongolia. (See _Erdmann_, II. 261.) Philostratus tells us

that the King of Taxila furnished white camels to Apollonius. I

doubt if the present King of Taxila, whom Anglo-Indians call the

Commissioner of Ráwal Pindi, could do the like.

_Cammellotti_ appear to have been fine woollen textures, by no

means what are now called camlets, nor were they necessarily of

camel’s wool, for those of Angora goat’s wool were much valued.

M. Douet d’Arcq calls it “a fine stuff of wool approaching to our

Cashmere, and sometimes of silk.” Indeed, as Mr. Marsh points

out, the word is Arabic, and has nothing to do with _Camel_ in

its origin; though it evidently came to be associated therewith.

_Khamlat_ is defined in F. Johnson’s Dict.: “Camelot, silk and

camel’s hair; also all silk or velvet, especially pily and plushy,”

and _Khaml_ is “pile or plush.” _Camelin_ was a different and

inferior material. There was till recently a considerable import

of different kinds of woollen goods from this part of China into

Ladakh, Kashmir, and the northern Panjáb. [Leaving Ning-hsia, Mr.

Rockhill writes (_Diary_, 1892, 44): “We passed on the road a cart

with Jardine and Matheson’s flag, coming probably from Chung-Wei

Hsien, where camel’s wool is sold in considerable quantities to

foreigners. This trade has fallen off very much in the last three

or four years on account of the Chinese middlemen rolling the

wool in the dirt so as to add to its weight, and practising other

tricks on buyers.”—H. C.] Among the names of these were _Sling_,

_Shirum_, _Gurun_, and _Khoza_, said to be the names of the towns

in China where the goods were made. We have supposed _Sling_ to be

Sining (note 2, ch. lvii.), but I can make nothing of the others.

Cunningham also mentions “camlets of camel’s hair,” under the name

of _Suḳlát_, among imports from the same quarter. The term _Suḳlát_

is, however, applied in the _Panjáb_ trade returns to _broadcloth_.

Does not this point to the real nature of the _siclatoun_ of the

Middle Ages? It is, indeed, often spoken of as used for banners,

which implies that it was not a _heavy_ woollen:

“There was mony gonfanoun

Of gold, sendel, and siclatoun.”

(_King Alisaundre_, in Weber, I. 85.)

But it was also a material for ladies’ robes, for quilts,

leggings, housings, pavilions. Franc. Michel does not decide what

it was, only that it was generally _red_ and wrought with gold.

Dozy renders it “silk stuff brocaded with gold”; but this seems

conjectural. Dr. Rock says it was a thin glossy silken stuff, often

with a woof of gold thread, and seems to derive it from the Arabic

ṣaḳl, “polishing” (a sword), which is improbable. Perhaps the name

is connected with _Ṣiḳiliyat_, “Sicily.”

(_Marsh on Wedgwood_, and _on Webster_ in _N. Y. Nation_, 1867;

_Douet D’Arcq_, p. 355; _Punjab Trade Rep._, App. ccxix.–xx.;

_Ladak_, 242; _Fr.-Michel Rech._ I. 221 _seqq._; _Dozy_, _Dict. des

Vêtements_, etc.; _Dr. Rock’s Kens. Catal._ xxxix.–xl.)